Matrimonial Causes Act 1973
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
10 Proceedings before divorce order made final: special protection for respondent.
(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2) The following provisions of this section apply where— (a) on an application for a divorce order a conditional order has been made and— (i) the conditional order is in favour of one party to a marriage, or (ii) the conditional order is in favour of both parties to a marriage but one of the parties has since withdrawn from the application, and (b) the respondent has applied to the court for consideration under subsection (3) of their financial position after the divorce. (3) Subject to subsection (4), the court hearing an application by the respondent under subsection (2) must not make the divorce order final unless it is satisfied— (a) that the applicant should not be required to make any financial provision for the respondent, or (b) that the financial provision made by the applicant for the respondent is reasonable and fair or the best that can be made in the circumstances. (3A) In making a determination under subsection (3) the court must consider all the circumstances including— (a) the age, health, conduct, earning capacity, financial resources and financial obligations of each of the parties to the marriage, and (b) the financial position of the respondent as, having regard to the divorce, it is likely to be after the death of the applicant should that person die first. (4) The court may if it thinks fit makes the divorce order final notwithstanding the requirements of subsection (3) above if— (a) it appears that there are circumstances making it desirable that the order should be made final without delay, and (b) the court has obtained a satisfactory undertaking from the applicant that they will make such financial provision for the respondent as the court may approve.
10 Proceedings before divorce order made final: special protection for respondent.
(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2) The following provisions of this section apply where— (a) on an application for a divorce order a conditional order has been made and— (i) the conditional order is in favour of one party to a marriage, or (ii) the conditional order is in favour of both parties to a marriage but one of the parties has since withdrawn from the application, and (b) the respondent has applied to the court for consideration under subsection (3) of their financial position after the divorce. (3) Subject to subsection (4), the court hearing an application by the respondent under subsection (2) must not make the divorce order final unless it is satisfied— (a) that the applicant should not be required to make any financial provision for the respondent, or (b) that the financial provision made by the applicant for the respondent is reasonable and fair or the best that can be made in the circumstances. (3A) In making a determination under subsection (3) the court must consider all the circumstances including— (a) the age, health, conduct, earning capacity, financial resources and financial obligations of each of the parties to the marriage, and (b) the financial position of the respondent as, having regard to the divorce, it is likely to be after the death of the applicant should that person die first. (4) The court may if it thinks fit makes the divorce order final notwithstanding the requirements of subsection (3) above if— (a) it appears that there are circumstances making it desirable that the order should be made final without delay, and (b) the court has obtained a satisfactory undertaking from the applicant that they will make such financial provision for the respondent as the court may approve.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.