The Common Agricultural Policy (Control and Enforcement, Cross-Compliance, Scrutiny of Transactions and Appeals) Regulations 2014
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
30 Interpretation
In this Part— “appellant” means a Pillar 1 appellant or a Pillar 2 appellant; “appointed person” means a person or persons (not exceeding three) appointed by the Secretary of State in relation to an appeal; “Pillar 1 appellant” means a farmer in respect of whom or in relation to whose holding, or other person in respect of whom, an initial Pillar 1 decision has been made, who wishes to have that initial decision reconsidered by the Secretary of State; “Pillar 1 decision” means, in relation to CMO support and direct payments, a decision made by or on behalf of the Secretary of State under any of the following ... instruments— the Direct Payments Delegated Regulation, the Direct Payments Implementing Regulation, the Direct Payments Regulation, the Horizontal Delegated Regulation, the Horizontal Implementing Regulation, the Horizontal Regulation, the SCMO Regulations; “Pillar 2 appellant” means a rural development applicant aggrieved by any initial Pillar 2 decision who wishes to have that initial decision reconsidered by the Secretary of State; “Pillar 2 decision” means, in relation to rural development support granted under Title III of the Rural Development Regulation or Title III, Chapter 2 of the Common Provisions Regulation— a decision made by or on behalf of the Secretary of State under any of the following ... instruments— the Common Provisions Regulation, the Horizontal Delegated Regulation, the Horizontal Implementing Regulation, the Horizontal Regulation, the Rural Development Delegated Regulation, the Rural Development Implementing Regulation, the Rural Development Regulation; or a determination made by a delivery body under regulation 14; “sum in dispute” means, in relation to any decision to make a payment, the sum which represents the difference between the sum the Secretary of State has determined to pay under the decision and the sum which the appellant claims to be due.
30 Interpretation
In this Part— “appellant” means a Pillar 1 appellant or a Pillar 2 appellant; “appointed person” means a person or persons (not exceeding three) appointed by the Secretary of State in relation to an appeal; “Pillar 1 appellant” means a farmer in respect of whom or in relation to whose holding, or other person in respect of whom, an initial Pillar 1 decision has been made, who wishes to have that initial decision reconsidered by the Secretary of State; “Pillar 1 decision” means, in relation to CMO support and direct payments, a decision made by or on behalf of the Secretary of State under any of the following ... instruments— the Direct Payments Delegated Regulation, the Direct Payments Implementing Regulation, the Direct Payments Regulation, the Horizontal Delegated Regulation, the Horizontal Implementing Regulation, the Horizontal Regulation, the SCMO Regulations; “Pillar 2 appellant” means a rural development applicant aggrieved by any initial Pillar 2 decision who wishes to have that initial decision reconsidered by the Secretary of State; “Pillar 2 decision” means, in relation to rural development support granted under Title III of the Rural Development Regulation or Title III, Chapter 2 of the Common Provisions Regulation— a decision made by or on behalf of the Secretary of State under any of the following ... instruments— the Common Provisions Regulation, the Horizontal Delegated Regulation, the Horizontal Implementing Regulation, the Horizontal Regulation, the Rural Development Delegated Regulation, the Rural Development Implementing Regulation, the Rural Development Regulation; or a determination made by a delivery body under regulation 14; “sum in dispute” means, in relation to any decision to make a payment, the sum which represents the difference between the sum the Secretary of State has determined to pay under the decision and the sum which the appellant claims to be due.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.