Further Education and Training Act 2007
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
23 Qualifications of principals of further education institutions
(1) Section 137 of the Education Act 2002 (c. 32) (power of Secretary of State or Welsh Ministers to make regulations requiring principals of further education institutions to have specified qualifications) is amended as follows. (2) After subsection (2) insert— (2A) Regulations under subsection (1) may limit the period of time during which a person may serve as the principal of an institution in reliance on subsection (2). (3) In subsection (3) (regulations made for England or Wales not to apply to persons already appointed to institutions)— (a) for “under subsection (1)” substitute “ made under subsection (1) by the Welsh Ministers in relation to Wales ”, and (b) after “an institution” insert “ in England or Wales ”.
23 Qualifications of principals of further education institutions
(1) Section 137 of the Education Act 2002 (c. 32) (power of Secretary of State or Welsh Ministers to make regulations requiring principals of further education institutions to have specified qualifications) is amended as follows. (2) After subsection (2) insert— (2A) Regulations under subsection (1) may limit the period of time during which a person may serve as the principal of an institution in reliance on subsection (2). (3) In subsection (3) (regulations made for England or Wales not to apply to persons already appointed to institutions)— (a) for “under subsection (1)” substitute “ made under subsection (1) by the Welsh Ministers in relation to Wales ”, and (b) after “an institution” insert “ in England or Wales ”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.