Propose a change

Health and Social Care Act 2012

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

173 Repeal of de-authorisation provisions

(1) Omit section 52C of the National Health Service Act 2006 (guidance etc. on de-authorisation notices). (2) Omit sections 53 to 55 of, and Schedule 9 to, that Act (voluntary arrangements and dissolution); and in consequence of that— (a) in section 57 of that Act (as amended by section 172 of this Act)— (i) in subsection (3)(a), for “the persons mentioned in section 54(4)” substitute “another NHS foundation trust, an NHS trust established under section 25 or the Secretary of State”, (ii) omit subsection (3)(b), and (iii) in subsection (4), for “any of the bodies mentioned in section 54(4)(a) or (c)” substitute “another NHS foundation trust or an NHS trust established under section 25”, (b) in section 64(4) of that Act (as amended by section 172 of this Act), omit paragraph (b), and (c) omit section 18(2) to (6) and (11) of the Health Act 2009. (3) Omit section 65E of the National Health Service Act 2006 (NHS foundation trusts: de-authorisation and appointment of administrator). (4) Omit Schedule 8A to that Act (de-authorised NHS trusts and NHS foundation trusts). (5) Omit section 15 of the Health Act 2009 (which inserts sections 52A to 52E and Schedule 8A in the National Health Service Act 2006). (6) In section 272 of the National Health Service Act 2006 (orders, regulations, rules and directions)— (a) in subsection (5), omit paragraph (aa), and (b) in subsection (6A), omit “52D(1), 52E(6),”. (7) In section 275(1) of that Act (interpretation), in the definition of “NHS trust”— (a) omit “, subject to Schedule 8A,”, and (b) omit “52D(1) or”. (8) In section 206(1) of the National Health Service (Wales) Act 2006, in the definition of “NHS trust”, omit “52D(1) or”.

Your change, as a redline

173 Repeal of de-authorisation provisions

(1) Omit section 52C of the National Health Service Act 2006 (guidance etc. on de-authorisation notices). (2) Omit sections 53 to 55 of, and Schedule 9 to, that Act (voluntary arrangements and dissolution); and in consequence of that— (a) in section 57 of that Act (as amended by section 172 of this Act)— (i) in subsection (3)(a), for “the persons mentioned in section 54(4)” substitute “another NHS foundation trust, an NHS trust established under section 25 or the Secretary of State”, (ii) omit subsection (3)(b), and (iii) in subsection (4), for “any of the bodies mentioned in section 54(4)(a) or (c)” substitute “another NHS foundation trust or an NHS trust established under section 25”, (b) in section 64(4) of that Act (as amended by section 172 of this Act), omit paragraph (b), and (c) omit section 18(2) to (6) and (11) of the Health Act 2009. (3) Omit section 65E of the National Health Service Act 2006 (NHS foundation trusts: de-authorisation and appointment of administrator). (4) Omit Schedule 8A to that Act (de-authorised NHS trusts and NHS foundation trusts). (5) Omit section 15 of the Health Act 2009 (which inserts sections 52A to 52E and Schedule 8A in the National Health Service Act 2006). (6) In section 272 of the National Health Service Act 2006 (orders, regulations, rules and directions)— (a) in subsection (5), omit paragraph (aa), and (b) in subsection (6A), omit “52D(1), 52E(6),”. (7) In section 275(1) of that Act (interpretation), in the definition of “NHS trust”— (a) omit “, subject to Schedule 8A,”, and (b) omit “52D(1) or”. (8) In section 206(1) of the National Health Service (Wales) Act 2006, in the definition of “NHS trust”, omit “52D(1) or”.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds