Propose a change

Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

8A Variation etc. of disqualification undertaking.

(1) The court may, on the application of a person who is subject to a disqualification undertaking— (a) reduce the period for which the undertaking is to be in force, or (b) provide for it to cease to be in force. (2) On the hearing of an application under subsection (1), the Secretary of State shall appear and call the attention of the court to any matters which seem to him to be relevant, and may himself give evidence or call witnesses. (2ZA) Subsection (2) does not apply to an application in the case of an undertaking given under section 8ZF or 8ZG, and in such a case on the hearing of the application an officer of Revenue and Customs— (a) must appear and call the attention of the court to any matters which appear to the officer to be relevant; (b) may give evidence or call witnesses. (2A) Subsection (2) does not apply to an application in the case of an undertaking given under section 9B, and in such a case on the hearing of the application whichever of the Competition and Markets Authority or a specified regulator (within the meaning of section 9E) accepted the undertaking— (a) must appear and call the attention of the court to any matters which appear to it or him (as the case may be) to be relevant; (b) may give evidence or call witnesses. (3) In this section “the court”— (za) in the case of an undertaking given under section 8ZC has the same meaning as in section 8ZA; (zb) in the case of an undertaking given under section 8ZE means the High Court or, in Scotland, the Court of Session; (a) in the case of an undertaking given under section 9B means the High Court or (in Scotland) the Court of Session; (b) in any other case has the same meaning as in section 5A(5), 7(2) , 8, 8ZF or 8ZG (as the case may be).

Your change, as a redline

8A Variation etc. of disqualification undertaking.

(1) The court may, on the application of a person who is subject to a disqualification undertaking— (a) reduce the period for which the undertaking is to be in force, or (b) provide for it to cease to be in force. (2) On the hearing of an application under subsection (1), the Secretary of State shall appear and call the attention of the court to any matters which seem to him to be relevant, and may himself give evidence or call witnesses. (2ZA) Subsection (2) does not apply to an application in the case of an undertaking given under section 8ZF or 8ZG, and in such a case on the hearing of the application an officer of Revenue and Customs— (a) must appear and call the attention of the court to any matters which appear to the officer to be relevant; (b) may give evidence or call witnesses. (2A) Subsection (2) does not apply to an application in the case of an undertaking given under section 9B, and in such a case on the hearing of the application whichever of the Competition and Markets Authority or a specified regulator (within the meaning of section 9E) accepted the undertaking— (a) must appear and call the attention of the court to any matters which appear to it or him (as the case may be) to be relevant; (b) may give evidence or call witnesses. (3) In this section “the court”— (za) in the case of an undertaking given under section 8ZC has the same meaning as in section 8ZA; (zb) in the case of an undertaking given under section 8ZE means the High Court or, in Scotland, the Court of Session; (a) in the case of an undertaking given under section 9B means the High Court or (in Scotland) the Court of Session; (b) in any other case has the same meaning as in section 5A(5), 7(2) , 8, 8ZF or 8ZG (as the case may be).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds