Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
8ZD Order disqualifying person instructing unfit director: other cases
(1) The court may make a disqualification order against a person (“P”) if, on an application under this section, it is satisfied— (a) either— (i) that a disqualification order under section 8 has been made against a person who is or has been a director (but not a shadow director) of a company, or (ii) that the Secretary of State has accepted a disqualification undertaking from such a person under section 8(2A), and (b) that P exercised the requisite amount of influence over the person. That person is referred to in this section as “the main transgressor”. (2) The Secretary of State may make an application to the court for a disqualification order against P under this section if it appears to the Secretary of State that it is expedient in the public interest for such an order to be made. (3) For the purposes of this section, P exercised the requisite amount of influence over the main transgressor if any of the conduct— (a) for which the main transgressor is subject to the order made under section 8, or (b) in relation to which the undertaking was accepted from the main transgressor under section 8(2A), was the result of the main transgressor acting in accordance with P's directions or instructions. (4) But P does not exercise the requisite amount of influence over the main transgressor by reason only that the main transgressor acts on advice given by P in a professional capacity. (5) Under this section the maximum period of disqualification is 15 years. (6) In this section “the court” means the High Court or, in Scotland, the Court of Session.
8ZD Order disqualifying person instructing unfit director: other cases
(1) The court may make a disqualification order against a person (“P”) if, on an application under this section, it is satisfied— (a) either— (i) that a disqualification order under section 8 has been made against a person who is or has been a director (but not a shadow director) of a company, or (ii) that the Secretary of State has accepted a disqualification undertaking from such a person under section 8(2A), and (b) that P exercised the requisite amount of influence over the person. That person is referred to in this section as “the main transgressor”. (2) The Secretary of State may make an application to the court for a disqualification order against P under this section if it appears to the Secretary of State that it is expedient in the public interest for such an order to be made. (3) For the purposes of this section, P exercised the requisite amount of influence over the main transgressor if any of the conduct— (a) for which the main transgressor is subject to the order made under section 8, or (b) in relation to which the undertaking was accepted from the main transgressor under section 8(2A), was the result of the main transgressor acting in accordance with P's directions or instructions. (4) But P does not exercise the requisite amount of influence over the main transgressor by reason only that the main transgressor acts on advice given by P in a professional capacity. (5) Under this section the maximum period of disqualification is 15 years. (6) In this section “the court” means the High Court or, in Scotland, the Court of Session.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.