Special Immigration Appeals Commission Act 1997
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
2C Jurisdiction: review of certain exclusion decisions
(1) Subsection (2) applies in relation to any direction about the exclusion of a person from the United Kingdom which— (a) is made by the Secretary of State wholly or partly on the ground that the exclusion from the United Kingdom of the person is conducive to the public good, (b) is not subject to a right of appeal, and (c) is certified by the Secretary of State as a direction that was made wholly or partly in reliance on information which, in the opinion of the Secretary of State, should not be made public— (i) in the interests of national security, (ii) in the interests of the relationship between the United Kingdom and another country, or (iii) otherwise in the public interest. (2) The person to whom the direction relates may apply to the Special Immigration Appeals Commission to set aside the direction. (3) In determining whether the direction should be set aside, the Commission must apply the principles which would be applied in judicial review proceedings. (4) If the Commission decides that the direction should be set aside, it may make any such order, or give any such relief, as may be made or given in judicial review proceedings. (5) ... References in this section to the Secretary of State are to the Secretary of State acting in person.
2C Jurisdiction: review of certain exclusion decisions
(1) Subsection (2) applies in relation to any direction about the exclusion of a person from the United Kingdom which— (a) is made by the Secretary of State wholly or partly on the ground that the exclusion from the United Kingdom of the person is conducive to the public good, (b) is not subject to a right of appeal, and (c) is certified by the Secretary of State as a direction that was made wholly or partly in reliance on information which, in the opinion of the Secretary of State, should not be made public— (i) in the interests of national security, (ii) in the interests of the relationship between the United Kingdom and another country, or (iii) otherwise in the public interest. (2) The person to whom the direction relates may apply to the Special Immigration Appeals Commission to set aside the direction. (3) In determining whether the direction should be set aside, the Commission must apply the principles which would be applied in judicial review proceedings. (4) If the Commission decides that the direction should be set aside, it may make any such order, or give any such relief, as may be made or given in judicial review proceedings. (5) ... References in this section to the Secretary of State are to the Secretary of State acting in person.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.