Special Immigration Appeals Commission Act 1997
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
6B Procedure in relation to jurisdiction under Schedule 4A to the British Nationality Act 1981
(1) The Lord Chancellor may make rules— (a) in relation to applications under paragraph 1(1), (2) or (6) or paragraph 2(5) of Schedule 4A to the British Nationality Act 1981 (deprivation of citizenship without notice), (b) for prescribing the practice and procedure to be followed on or in connection with applications under those paragraphs, including the mode and burden of proof and admissibility of evidence on such applications, and (c) for other matters preliminary or incidental to or arising out of such applications, including proof of the decisions of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission. (2) Rules under this section may, in particular, do anything which may be done by Tribunal Procedure Rules. (3) Rules under this section may make provision— (a) enabling any functions of the Commission which relate to an application under a provision mentioned in subsection (1)(a) to be performed by a single member of the Commission, or (b) conferring on the Commission such ancillary powers as the Lord Chancellor thinks necessary for the purposes of the exercise of its functions. (4) In making rules under this section, the Lord Chancellor must have regard, in particular, to— (a) the need to secure that decisions which are the subject of applications are properly reviewed, and (b) the need to secure that information is not disclosed contrary to the public interest. (5) The power to make rules under this section is exercisable by statutory instrument. (6) No rules may be made under this section unless a draft of them has been laid before and approved by resolution of each House of Parliament.
6B Procedure in relation to jurisdiction under Schedule 4A to the British Nationality Act 1981
(1) The Lord Chancellor may make rules— (a) in relation to applications under paragraph 1(1), (2) or (6) or paragraph 2(5) of Schedule 4A to the British Nationality Act 1981 (deprivation of citizenship without notice), (b) for prescribing the practice and procedure to be followed on or in connection with applications under those paragraphs, including the mode and burden of proof and admissibility of evidence on such applications, and (c) for other matters preliminary or incidental to or arising out of such applications, including proof of the decisions of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission. (2) Rules under this section may, in particular, do anything which may be done by Tribunal Procedure Rules. (3) Rules under this section may make provision— (a) enabling any functions of the Commission which relate to an application under a provision mentioned in subsection (1)(a) to be performed by a single member of the Commission, or (b) conferring on the Commission such ancillary powers as the Lord Chancellor thinks necessary for the purposes of the exercise of its functions. (4) In making rules under this section, the Lord Chancellor must have regard, in particular, to— (a) the need to secure that decisions which are the subject of applications are properly reviewed, and (b) the need to secure that information is not disclosed contrary to the public interest. (5) The power to make rules under this section is exercisable by statutory instrument. (6) No rules may be made under this section unless a draft of them has been laid before and approved by resolution of each House of Parliament.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.