Horserace Betting Levy Act 1981
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
SCHEDULE Consequential Amendments of the Act of 1963 and the Act of 1969
Section 4(6) The Act of 1963 1 In section 28 of the Act of 1963 (assessment of or exemption from bookmakers’ levy)— (a) in subsection (7), after the word “shall”, in the first place where it occurs, there shall be inserted the words “(except to the extent of any payments on account)”; (b) in subsection (8), after the words “levy period” there shall be inserted the words “in accordance with the notice of assessment issued in his case”; (c) in subsection (10)(b)(i), after the word “him” there shall be inserted the words “under this section”. 2 In section 29(1) of the Act of 1963 (levy appeal tribunals)— (a) after the words “section 28 of this Act” there shall be inserted the words “and section 2 of the Horserace Betting Levy Act 1981”; (b) after the words “section 28(5) of this Act” there shall be inserted the words “or section 2(1) of the said Act of 1981”. 3 In Schedule 1 to the Act of 1963, in paragraph 16(2) (grounds for refusal to renew bookmaker’s permit) for the words “by way of” there shall be substituted the words “under assessments to”. The Act of 1969 4 In section 2 of the Act of 1969 (assessment to levy of individual bookmakers)— (a) in subsection (2), for the word “scheme”, in the second place where it occurs, there shall be substituted the word “levy”; (b) in subsection (4), for the word “scheme”, there shall be substituted the word “levy”. 5 In section 3(1) of the Act of 1969 (Levy Board’s costs on appeal by bookmaker against assessment of levy)— (a) after the words “individual bookmakers to levy” there shall be inserted the words “or under section 2 of the Horserace Betting Levy Act 1981 (appeals against notices of determination of liability to mnake payments on account)”; (b) after the words “assessment notice” there shall be inserted the words “or a notice of determination”.
SCHEDULE Consequential Amendments of the Act of 1963 and the Act of 1969
Section 4(6) The Act of 1963 1 In section 28 of the Act of 1963 (assessment of or exemption from bookmakers’ levy)— (a) in subsection (7), after the word “shall”, in the first place where it occurs, there shall be inserted the words “(except to the extent of any payments on account)”; (b) in subsection (8), after the words “levy period” there shall be inserted the words “in accordance with the notice of assessment issued in his case”; (c) in subsection (10)(b)(i), after the word “him” there shall be inserted the words “under this section”. 2 In section 29(1) of the Act of 1963 (levy appeal tribunals)— (a) after the words “section 28 of this Act” there shall be inserted the words “and section 2 of the Horserace Betting Levy Act 1981”; (b) after the words “section 28(5) of this Act” there shall be inserted the words “or section 2(1) of the said Act of 1981”. 3 In Schedule 1 to the Act of 1963, in paragraph 16(2) (grounds for refusal to renew bookmaker’s permit) for the words “by way of” there shall be substituted the words “under assessments to”. The Act of 1969 4 In section 2 of the Act of 1969 (assessment to levy of individual bookmakers)— (a) in subsection (2), for the word “scheme”, in the second place where it occurs, there shall be substituted the word “levy”; (b) in subsection (4), for the word “scheme”, there shall be substituted the word “levy”. 5 In section 3(1) of the Act of 1969 (Levy Board’s costs on appeal by bookmaker against assessment of levy)— (a) after the words “individual bookmakers to levy” there shall be inserted the words “or under section 2 of the Horserace Betting Levy Act 1981 (appeals against notices of determination of liability to mnake payments on account)”; (b) after the words “assessment notice” there shall be inserted the words “or a notice of determination”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.