Propose a change

Housing Act 2004

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

48 Transfer of jurisdiction in respect of appeals relating to demolition orders etc.

(1) Part 9 of the Housing Act 1985 (c. 68) (slum clearance) is further amended as follows. (2) In section 269 (right of appeal against demolition order etc.)— (a) in subsection (1), for “the county court” substitute “ a residential property tribunal ”; (b) in subsection (3), for “court” substitute “ tribunal ”; and (c) in subsection (6)(a) and (b), for “Court of Appeal” substitute “ Lands Tribunal ”. (3) In section 272 (demolition orders)— (a) in subsection (2), for “the court” in the first place it appears substitute “ a residential property tribunal ”, and in the second place it appears substitute “ such a tribunal ”; (b) in subsection (5), for the words from the beginning to “and has” substitute “ A residential property tribunal has jurisdiction to hear and determine proceedings under subsection (1) (as well as those under subsection (2)), and a county court has ”; and (c) in subsection (6), for “the court” substitute “ a tribunal or court ”. (4) In section 317 (power of court to determine lease where premises demolished etc.)— (a) in subsection (1), for “the county court” substitute “ a residential property tribunal ”; and (b) in subsections (2) and (3), for “court” substitute “ tribunal ”. (5) In section 318 (power of court to authorise execution of works on unfit premises or for improvement)— (a) in the sidenote, for “court” substitute “ tribunal ”; (b) in subsection (1), for “the court” in the first place it appears substitute “ a residential property tribunal ”, and in the second place it appears substitute “ the tribunal ”; (c) in subsections (2) and (3), for “court” substitute “ tribunal ”; and (d) omit subsection (4).

Your change, as a redline

48 Transfer of jurisdiction in respect of appeals relating to demolition orders etc.

(1) Part 9 of the Housing Act 1985 (c. 68) (slum clearance) is further amended as follows. (2) In section 269 (right of appeal against demolition order etc.)— (a) in subsection (1), for “the county court” substitute “ a residential property tribunal ”; (b) in subsection (3), for “court” substitute “ tribunal ”; and (c) in subsection (6)(a) and (b), for “Court of Appeal” substitute “ Lands Tribunal ”. (3) In section 272 (demolition orders)— (a) in subsection (2), for “the court” in the first place it appears substitute “ a residential property tribunal ”, and in the second place it appears substitute “ such a tribunal ”; (b) in subsection (5), for the words from the beginning to “and has” substitute “ A residential property tribunal has jurisdiction to hear and determine proceedings under subsection (1) (as well as those under subsection (2)), and a county court has ”; and (c) in subsection (6), for “the court” substitute “ a tribunal or court ”. (4) In section 317 (power of court to determine lease where premises demolished etc.)— (a) in subsection (1), for “the county court” substitute “ a residential property tribunal ”; and (b) in subsections (2) and (3), for “court” substitute “ tribunal ”. (5) In section 318 (power of court to authorise execution of works on unfit premises or for improvement)— (a) in the sidenote, for “court” substitute “ tribunal ”; (b) in subsection (1), for “the court” in the first place it appears substitute “ a residential property tribunal ”, and in the second place it appears substitute “ the tribunal ”; (c) in subsections (2) and (3), for “court” substitute “ tribunal ”; and (d) omit subsection (4).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds