Propose a change

Representation of the People Act 1983

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

141 Duty to answer relevant questions.

(1) A person called as a witness respecting an election before any election court shall not be excused from answering any question relating to any offence at or connected with the election— (a) on the ground that the answer to it may incriminate or tend to incriminate— (i) that person or that person’s spouse or civil partner, , or (ii) in Scotland, that person; or (b) on the ground of privilege. (2) An answer by a person to a question put by or before any election court shall not, except in the case of any criminal proceeding for perjury in respect of the evidence, be in any proceeding, civil or criminal, admissible in evidence against— (a) that person or that person’s spouse or civil partner, ; or (b) in Scotland, that person. (3), (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Your change, as a redline

141 Duty to answer relevant questions.

(1) A person called as a witness respecting an election before any election court shall not be excused from answering any question relating to any offence at or connected with the election— (a) on the ground that the answer to it may incriminate or tend to incriminate— (i) that person or that person’s spouse or civil partner, , or (ii) in Scotland, that person; or (b) on the ground of privilege. (2) An answer by a person to a question put by or before any election court shall not, except in the case of any criminal proceeding for perjury in respect of the evidence, be in any proceeding, civil or criminal, admissible in evidence against— (a) that person or that person’s spouse or civil partner, ; or (b) in Scotland, that person. (3), (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds