Propose a change

Representation of the People Act 1983

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

77 Expenses limit for joint candidates at local election.

(1) Where there are two or more joint candidates at a local government election other than an Authority election the maximum amount mentioned in section 76 above shall, for each of those joint candidates, be reduced by a quarter or, if there are more than two joint candidates, by one-third. (2) Where two or more candidates appoint the same election agent, or by themselves or any agent or agents— (a) employ or use the services of the same clerks or messengers at the election, or (b) hire or use the same committee rooms for the election, or (c) publish a joint address, circular or notice at the election, those candidates shall for the purposes of this section be deemed to be joint candidates; but— (i) the employment and use of the same clerk, messenger or committee room, if accidental or casual, or of a trivial and unimportant character, shall not be deemed of itself to constitute persons joint candidates; (ii) nothing in this subsection shall prevent candidates from ceasing to be joint candidates. (3) Where— (a) any excess of expenses above the maximum allowed for one of two or more joint candidates has arisen owing to his having ceased to be a joint candidate, or to his having become a joint candidate after having begun to conduct his election as a separate candidate, (b) the change was made in good faith, (c) the excess is not more than under the circumstances is reasonable, and (d) the total election expenses of the candidate do not exceed the maximum amount allowed for a separate candidate, the excess shall be deemed to have arisen from a reasonable cause for the purposes of section 167 below.

Your change, as a redline

77 Expenses limit for joint candidates at local election.

(1) Where there are two or more joint candidates at a local government election other than an Authority election the maximum amount mentioned in section 76 above shall, for each of those joint candidates, be reduced by a quarter or, if there are more than two joint candidates, by one-third. (2) Where two or more candidates appoint the same election agent, or by themselves or any agent or agents— (a) employ or use the services of the same clerks or messengers at the election, or (b) hire or use the same committee rooms for the election, or (c) publish a joint address, circular or notice at the election, those candidates shall for the purposes of this section be deemed to be joint candidates; but— (i) the employment and use of the same clerk, messenger or committee room, if accidental or casual, or of a trivial and unimportant character, shall not be deemed of itself to constitute persons joint candidates; (ii) nothing in this subsection shall prevent candidates from ceasing to be joint candidates. (3) Where— (a) any excess of expenses above the maximum allowed for one of two or more joint candidates has arisen owing to his having ceased to be a joint candidate, or to his having become a joint candidate after having begun to conduct his election as a separate candidate, (b) the change was made in good faith, (c) the excess is not more than under the circumstances is reasonable, and (d) the total election expenses of the candidate do not exceed the maximum amount allowed for a separate candidate, the excess shall be deemed to have arisen from a reasonable cause for the purposes of section 167 below.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds