Infrastructure Act 2015
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
27 Two-person Panels
(1) In section 65 of the Planning Act 2008 (appointment of Panel to examine application for order granting development consent) in subsection (1)(a) (Panel to consist of three, four or five persons) before “three” insert “ two, ”. (2) In section 68(3) of that Act (duty of Secretary of State to appoint additional members if Panel comes to have two members or a single member)— (a) omit “two members or”, and (b) for “three” substitute “ two ”. (3) In section 73(1)(b) of that Act (Panel's continuing identity not affected by its coming to have two members or a single member) omit “two members or”. (4) In section 75 of that Act (decision-making by Panel)— (a) before subsection (1) insert— (A1) If the members of a Panel with two members disagree as to a proposed decision by the Panel, the view of the lead member is to prevail. , and (b) in subsection (1) (decision by Panel requires the agreement of a majority) for “the Panel” substitute “ a Panel with three or more members ”.
27 Two-person Panels
(1) In section 65 of the Planning Act 2008 (appointment of Panel to examine application for order granting development consent) in subsection (1)(a) (Panel to consist of three, four or five persons) before “three” insert “ two, ”. (2) In section 68(3) of that Act (duty of Secretary of State to appoint additional members if Panel comes to have two members or a single member)— (a) omit “two members or”, and (b) for “three” substitute “ two ”. (3) In section 73(1)(b) of that Act (Panel's continuing identity not affected by its coming to have two members or a single member) omit “two members or”. (4) In section 75 of that Act (decision-making by Panel)— (a) before subsection (1) insert— (A1) If the members of a Panel with two members disagree as to a proposed decision by the Panel, the view of the lead member is to prevail. , and (b) in subsection (1) (decision by Panel requires the agreement of a majority) for “the Panel” substitute “ a Panel with three or more members ”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.