The Town and Country Planning (Crown Development Applications) (Procedure and Written Representations) Order 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
23 Duty to respond to consultation
(1) The requirements to consult which are prescribed for the purposes of section 54(2) of the 2004 Act (duty to respond to consultation) are those contained in articles 20, 21 and 22. (2) For the purposes of section 54(4)(a) of the 2004 Act, an authority or person consulted (“the consultee”) under articles 20, 21 or 22 must give a substantive response to that consultation before the end of— (a) the period of 21 days beginning with the day on which— (i) the document on which the consultee's views are sought is sent, or (ii) where there is more than one such document and they are sent on different days, the last of those documents or notices is sent, or (b) such other period as may be agreed in writing between the consultee and the Secretary of State. (3) The Secretary of State must not determine the application before the end of the period within which the consultee must respond in accordance with paragraph (2), unless the Secretary of State has received a substantive response from the consultee before the end of that period. (4) A substantive response— (a) in relation to a consultee under articles 20 and 21 is one which— (i) states that the consultee has no comment to make, (ii) states that, on the basis of the information available, the consultee is content with the development proposed, (iii) refers the Secretary of State to current standing advice by the consultee on the subject of the consultation, or (iv) provides advice to the Secretary of State; (b) in relation to a consultee under article 22 is one which— (i) states that the PSI authority has no comment to make, or (ii) sets out whether the PSI authority considers that the application complies with the spatial development strategy of the authority and the authority’s reasons for taking that view. (5) In this article, “PSI authority” has the same meaning as in article 22.
23 Duty to respond to consultation
(1) The requirements to consult which are prescribed for the purposes of section 54(2) of the 2004 Act (duty to respond to consultation) are those contained in articles 20, 21 and 22. (2) For the purposes of section 54(4)(a) of the 2004 Act, an authority or person consulted (“the consultee”) under articles 20, 21 or 22 must give a substantive response to that consultation before the end of— (a) the period of 21 days beginning with the day on which— (i) the document on which the consultee's views are sought is sent, or (ii) where there is more than one such document and they are sent on different days, the last of those documents or notices is sent, or (b) such other period as may be agreed in writing between the consultee and the Secretary of State. (3) The Secretary of State must not determine the application before the end of the period within which the consultee must respond in accordance with paragraph (2), unless the Secretary of State has received a substantive response from the consultee before the end of that period. (4) A substantive response— (a) in relation to a consultee under articles 20 and 21 is one which— (i) states that the consultee has no comment to make, (ii) states that, on the basis of the information available, the consultee is content with the development proposed, (iii) refers the Secretary of State to current standing advice by the consultee on the subject of the consultation, or (iv) provides advice to the Secretary of State; (b) in relation to a consultee under article 22 is one which— (i) states that the PSI authority has no comment to make, or (ii) sets out whether the PSI authority considers that the application complies with the spatial development strategy of the authority and the authority’s reasons for taking that view. (5) In this article, “PSI authority” has the same meaning as in article 22.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.