Appropriation Act 1992 (repealed 21.7.1994)
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
SCHEDULE (B)—
Part 24 Class XX Schedule of Sums granted and of the sums of which may be applied as appropriations in aid in addition thereto, to defray the charges of the several Services herein particularly mentioned, which will come in course of payment during the year ending on 31st March 1993, viz.:— Sums not exceeding Supply Grants | Appropriations in Aid Vote | £ | £ 1. For expenditure by Her Majesty’s Treasury on contributions to the Budget of the European Communities not covered by direct charges on the Consolidated Fund under Section 2(3) of the European Communities Act 1972 | 1,350,000,000 Total, ClassXX -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- £ | 1,350,000,000
SCHEDULE (B)—
Part 24 Class XX Schedule of Sums granted and of the sums of which may be applied as appropriations in aid in addition thereto, to defray the charges of the several Services herein particularly mentioned, which will come in course of payment during the year ending on 31st March 1993, viz.:— Sums not exceeding Supply Grants | Appropriations in Aid Vote | £ | £ 1. For expenditure by Her Majesty’s Treasury on contributions to the Budget of the European Communities not covered by direct charges on the Consolidated Fund under Section 2(3) of the European Communities Act 1972 | 1,350,000,000 Total, ClassXX -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- £ | 1,350,000,000
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.