Propose a change

Housing and Regeneration Act 2008

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

54 Validity of transactions

(1) A transaction between a person and the HCA is not invalid merely because of a failure by the HCA to exercise its powers for the purposes mentioned in sections 3 and 4(2). (2) A transaction between a person and the HCA is not invalid merely because it was carried out in contravention of a direction under section 47. (3) A transaction between a person and a subsidiary of the HCA is not invalid merely because of a failure by the HCA to comply with section 41(1) or (2). (4) A person entering into a transaction with the HCA or a subsidiary of the HCA need not be concerned as to whether— (a) there has been a failure of the kind mentioned in subsection (1) or (3), or (b) a direction of the kind mentioned in subsection (2) has been given or complied with. (5) A disposal of land by the HCA is not invalid merely because any consent required by section 10(1) or (3) has not been given. (6) A person dealing with— (a) the HCA, or (b) a person claiming under the HCA, in relation to any land need not be concerned as to whether any consent required by section 10(1) or (3) has been given.

Your change, as a redline

54 Validity of transactions

(1) A transaction between a person and the HCA is not invalid merely because of a failure by the HCA to exercise its powers for the purposes mentioned in sections 3 and 4(2). (2) A transaction between a person and the HCA is not invalid merely because it was carried out in contravention of a direction under section 47. (3) A transaction between a person and a subsidiary of the HCA is not invalid merely because of a failure by the HCA to comply with section 41(1) or (2). (4) A person entering into a transaction with the HCA or a subsidiary of the HCA need not be concerned as to whether— (a) there has been a failure of the kind mentioned in subsection (1) or (3), or (b) a direction of the kind mentioned in subsection (2) has been given or complied with. (5) A disposal of land by the HCA is not invalid merely because any consent required by section 10(1) or (3) has not been given. (6) A person dealing with— (a) the HCA, or (b) a person claiming under the HCA, in relation to any land need not be concerned as to whether any consent required by section 10(1) or (3) has been given.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds