Riot Compensation Act 2016
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
SCHEDULE MOTOR VEHICLES IN RESPECT OF WHICH CLAIMS MAY BE MADE
Section 2 Vehicles not insured for riot damage 1 A motor vehicle falls within this paragraph if, at the time of the riot— (a) it was covered by a policy of insurance or a security in respect of third party risks that complied with the requirements of Part 6 of the Road Traffic Act 1988, but was not covered, or (disregarding any excess) not adequately covered, in respect of the damage, destruction or theft resulting from the riot, and (b) the appropriate amount of vehicle excise duty had been paid in respect of the vehicle. Vehicles not insured because exempt from insurance requirement 2 A motor vehicle falls within this paragraph if, at the time of the riot— (a) it fell within one of the exceptions to the requirements of Part 6 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 mentioned in section 144(1) or (2) of that Act, (b) it was not covered by a policy of insurance or security in respect of the damage, destruction or theft resulting from the riot, and (c) the appropriate amount of vehicle excise duty had been paid in respect of the vehicle. Vehicles not kept or used on public road 3 A motor vehicle falls within this paragraph if, at the time of the riot, the condition mentioned in section 144B(5) or (6A) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 was met in respect of the vehicle (vehicle not kept or used on public road). Vehicles part of stock in trade 4 A motor vehicle falls within this paragraph if, at the time of the riot, it was part of the stock in trade of a business.
SCHEDULE MOTOR VEHICLES IN RESPECT OF WHICH CLAIMS MAY BE MADE
Section 2 Vehicles not insured for riot damage 1 A motor vehicle falls within this paragraph if, at the time of the riot— (a) it was covered by a policy of insurance or a security in respect of third party risks that complied with the requirements of Part 6 of the Road Traffic Act 1988, but was not covered, or (disregarding any excess) not adequately covered, in respect of the damage, destruction or theft resulting from the riot, and (b) the appropriate amount of vehicle excise duty had been paid in respect of the vehicle. Vehicles not insured because exempt from insurance requirement 2 A motor vehicle falls within this paragraph if, at the time of the riot— (a) it fell within one of the exceptions to the requirements of Part 6 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 mentioned in section 144(1) or (2) of that Act, (b) it was not covered by a policy of insurance or security in respect of the damage, destruction or theft resulting from the riot, and (c) the appropriate amount of vehicle excise duty had been paid in respect of the vehicle. Vehicles not kept or used on public road 3 A motor vehicle falls within this paragraph if, at the time of the riot, the condition mentioned in section 144B(5) or (6A) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 was met in respect of the vehicle (vehicle not kept or used on public road). Vehicles part of stock in trade 4 A motor vehicle falls within this paragraph if, at the time of the riot, it was part of the stock in trade of a business.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.