Propose a change

Civil Evidence Act 1995

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

SCHEDULE 2 Repeals

Section 15(2). Chapter | Short title | Extent of repeal 1938 c. 28. | Evidence Act 1938. | Sections 1 and 2. Section 6(1) except the words from “Proceedings” to “references”. Section 6(2)(b). 1968 c. 64. | Civil Evidence Act 1968. | Part I. 1971 c. 33. | Armed Forces Act 1971. | Section 26. 1972 c. 30. | Civil Evidence Act 1972. | Section 1. Section 2(1) and (2). In section 2(3)(b), the words from “by virtue of section 2” to “out-of-court statements)”. In section 3(1), the words “Part I of the Civil Evidence Act 1968 or”. In section 6(3), the words “1 and”, in both places where they occur. 1975 c. 63. | Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975. | Section 21. 1979 c. 2. | Customs and Excise Management Act 1979. | Section 75A(6)(a). Section 118A(6)(a). 1980 c. 43. | Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980. | In Schedule 7, paragraph 75. 1984 c. 28. | County Courts Act 1984. | In Schedule 2, paragraphs 33 and 34. 1985 c. 54. | Finance Act 1985. | Section 10(7). 1986 c. 21. | Armed Forces Act 1986. | Section 3. 1988 c. 39. | Finance Act 1988. | Section 127(5). 1990 c. 26. | Gaming (Amendment) Act 1990. | In the Schedule, paragraph 2(7). 1994 c. 9. | Finance Act 1994. | Section 22(2)(a). In Schedule 7, paragraph 1(6)(a). 1994 c. 23. | Value Added Tax Act 1994. | Section 96(6) and (7). In Schedule 11, paragraph 6(6)(a). 1995 c. 4. | Finance Act 1995. | In Schedule 4, paragraph 38.

Your change, as a redline

SCHEDULE 2 Repeals

Section 15(2). Chapter | Short title | Extent of repeal 1938 c. 28. | Evidence Act 1938. | Sections 1 and 2. Section 6(1) except the words from “Proceedings” to “references”. Section 6(2)(b). 1968 c. 64. | Civil Evidence Act 1968. | Part I. 1971 c. 33. | Armed Forces Act 1971. | Section 26. 1972 c. 30. | Civil Evidence Act 1972. | Section 1. Section 2(1) and (2). In section 2(3)(b), the words from “by virtue of section 2” to “out-of-court statements)”. In section 3(1), the words “Part I of the Civil Evidence Act 1968 or”. In section 6(3), the words “1 and”, in both places where they occur. 1975 c. 63. | Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975. | Section 21. 1979 c. 2. | Customs and Excise Management Act 1979. | Section 75A(6)(a). Section 118A(6)(a). 1980 c. 43. | Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980. | In Schedule 7, paragraph 75. 1984 c. 28. | County Courts Act 1984. | In Schedule 2, paragraphs 33 and 34. 1985 c. 54. | Finance Act 1985. | Section 10(7). 1986 c. 21. | Armed Forces Act 1986. | Section 3. 1988 c. 39. | Finance Act 1988. | Section 127(5). 1990 c. 26. | Gaming (Amendment) Act 1990. | In the Schedule, paragraph 2(7). 1994 c. 9. | Finance Act 1994. | Section 22(2)(a). In Schedule 7, paragraph 1(6)(a). 1994 c. 23. | Value Added Tax Act 1994. | Section 96(6) and (7). In Schedule 11, paragraph 6(6)(a). 1995 c. 4. | Finance Act 1995. | In Schedule 4, paragraph 38.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds