Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
115 National disqualification
(1) If the First-tier Tribunal removes the practitioner from a list, it may also decide to disqualify him from inclusion in—
(a) the pharmaceutical lists and ophthalmic lists prepared by each Local Health Board,
(b) the supplementary lists prepared by each Local Health Board,
(c) the lists under section 49 or 63 prepared by each Local Health Board,
(d) the lists corresponding to the lists under section 49 prepared by each Local Health Board by virtue of regulations made under section 103,
(e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(f) the lists corresponding to the lists mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (d) prepared by NHS England under or by virtue of the National Health Service Act 2006,
or only from inclusion in one or more descriptions of such lists prepared by each Local Health Board and NHS England ..., the description being specified by the First-tier Tribunal in its decision.
(2) A decision by the First-tier Tribunal to do what is mentioned in subsection (1) is referred to in this section as the imposition of a national disqualification.
(3) The First-tier Tribunal may also impose a national disqualification on a practitioner if it dismisses an appeal by him against the refusal by a Local Health Board to include him in such a list.
(4) The Local Health Board may apply to the First-tier Tribunal for a national disqualification to be imposed on a person after the Local Health Board has—
(a) removed him from a list prepared by it of any of the kinds referred to in subsection (1)(a) to (d), or
(b) refused to include him in such a list.
(5) Any such application must be made before the end of the period of three months beginning with the date of the removal or of the Local Health Board's refusal.
(6) If the First-tier Tribunal imposes a national disqualification on a person—
(a) no Local Health Board ...or NHS England may include him in a list of any of the kinds prepared by it from which he has been disqualified from inclusion, and
(b) if he is included, and NHS England, in such a list, each Local Health Board... in whose list he is included must remove him from it.
(7) The First-tier Tribunal may at the request of the person upon whom it has been imposed review a national disqualification, and on a review may confirm it or revoke it.
(8) Subject to subsection (9), the person may not request such a review before the end of the period of—
(a) two years beginning with the date on which the national disqualification was imposed, or
(b) one year beginning with the date of the First-tier Tribunal's decision on the last such review.
(9) The Welsh Ministers may provide in regulations for subsection (8) to have effect in prescribed circumstances as if the reference there to “two years” or “one year” were a reference to a different period specified in the regulations.
Your change, as a redline
115 National disqualification
(1) If the First-tier Tribunal removes the practitioner from a list, it may also decide to disqualify him from inclusion in—
(a) the pharmaceutical lists and ophthalmic lists prepared by each Local Health Board,
(b) the supplementary lists prepared by each Local Health Board,
(c) the lists under section 49 or 63 prepared by each Local Health Board,
(d) the lists corresponding to the lists under section 49 prepared by each Local Health Board by virtue of regulations made under section 103,
(e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(f) the lists corresponding to the lists mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (d) prepared by NHS England under or by virtue of the National Health Service Act 2006,
or only from inclusion in one or more descriptions of such lists prepared by each Local Health Board and NHS England ..., the description being specified by the First-tier Tribunal in its decision.
(2) A decision by the First-tier Tribunal to do what is mentioned in subsection (1) is referred to in this section as the imposition of a national disqualification.
(3) The First-tier Tribunal may also impose a national disqualification on a practitioner if it dismisses an appeal by him against the refusal by a Local Health Board to include him in such a list.
(4) The Local Health Board may apply to the First-tier Tribunal for a national disqualification to be imposed on a person after the Local Health Board has—
(a) removed him from a list prepared by it of any of the kinds referred to in subsection (1)(a) to (d), or
(b) refused to include him in such a list.
(5) Any such application must be made before the end of the period of three months beginning with the date of the removal or of the Local Health Board's refusal.
(6) If the First-tier Tribunal imposes a national disqualification on a person—
(a) no Local Health Board ...or NHS England may include him in a list of any of the kinds prepared by it from which he has been disqualified from inclusion, and
(b) if he is included, and NHS England, in such a list, each Local Health Board... in whose list he is included must remove him from it.
(7) The First-tier Tribunal may at the request of the person upon whom it has been imposed review a national disqualification, and on a review may confirm it or revoke it.
(8) Subject to subsection (9), the person may not request such a review before the end of the period of—
(a) two years beginning with the date on which the national disqualification was imposed, or
(b) one year beginning with the date of the First-tier Tribunal's decision on the last such review.
(9) The Welsh Ministers may provide in regulations for subsection (8) to have effect in prescribed circumstances as if the reference there to “two years” or “one year” were a reference to a different period specified in the regulations.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.