Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
44 Persons eligible to enter into GMS contracts
(1) A Local Health Board may, subject to such conditions as may be prescribed, enter into a general medical services contract with—
(a) a medical practitioner,
(b) two or more individuals practising in partnership where the conditions in subsection (2) are satisfied, or
(c) a company limited by shares where the conditions in subsection (3) are satisfied.
(2) The conditions referred to in subsection (1)(b) are that—
(a) at least one partner is a medical practitioner, and
(b) any partner who is not a medical practitioner is either—
(i) an NHS employee,
(ii) a section 50 employee, section 64 employee, section 92 employee, section 107 employee, section 17C employee or Article 15B employee,
(iii) a health care professional who is engaged in the provision of services under this Act or the National Health Service Act 2006 (c. 41), or
(iv) an individual falling within section 51(1)(d).
(3) The conditions referred to in subsection (1)(c) are that—
(a) at least one share in the company is legally and beneficially owned by a medical practitioner, and
(b) any share which is not so owned is legally and beneficially owned by a person referred to in subsection (2)(b).
(4) Regulations may make provision as to the effect, in relation to a general medical services contract entered into by individuals practising in partnership, of a change in the membership of the partnership.
(5) In this section—
“health care professional”, “NHS employee”, “section 50 employee”, “section 64 employee”, “section 92 employee”, “section 107 employee”, “section 17C employee” and “Article 15B employee” have the meaning given by section 51.
Your change, as a redline
44 Persons eligible to enter into GMS contracts
(1) A Local Health Board may, subject to such conditions as may be prescribed, enter into a general medical services contract with—
(a) a medical practitioner,
(b) two or more individuals practising in partnership where the conditions in subsection (2) are satisfied, or
(c) a company limited by shares where the conditions in subsection (3) are satisfied.
(2) The conditions referred to in subsection (1)(b) are that—
(a) at least one partner is a medical practitioner, and
(b) any partner who is not a medical practitioner is either—
(i) an NHS employee,
(ii) a section 50 employee, section 64 employee, section 92 employee, section 107 employee, section 17C employee or Article 15B employee,
(iii) a health care professional who is engaged in the provision of services under this Act or the National Health Service Act 2006 (c. 41), or
(iv) an individual falling within section 51(1)(d).
(3) The conditions referred to in subsection (1)(c) are that—
(a) at least one share in the company is legally and beneficially owned by a medical practitioner, and
(b) any share which is not so owned is legally and beneficially owned by a person referred to in subsection (2)(b).
(4) Regulations may make provision as to the effect, in relation to a general medical services contract entered into by individuals practising in partnership, of a change in the membership of the partnership.
(5) In this section—
“health care professional”, “NHS employee”, “section 50 employee”, “section 64 employee”, “section 92 employee”, “section 107 employee”, “section 17C employee” and “Article 15B employee” have the meaning given by section 51.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.