Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
84 Regulations under section 83: appeals, etc
(1) Regulations under section 83 must include provision conferring on such persons as may be prescribed rights of appeal from decisions made by virtue of that section.
(2) If regulations made by virtue of section 83(6)(g) provide that a Local Health Board may refuse to grant an application on grounds corresponding to the conditions referred to in section 107(2), (3) or (4) as read with section 109, they must also provide for an appeal... to the First-tier Tribunal against the decision of the Local Health Board.
(3) Regulations under section 83 must be so framed as to preclude—
(a) a person included in a pharmaceutical list, and
(b) an employee of such a person,
from taking part in the decision whether an application such as is mentioned in section 83(2)(c) should be granted or an appeal against such a decision brought by virtue of subsection (1) of this section should be allowed.
(4) If regulations made under section 83 include provision for a Local Health Board to remove a person or an entry in respect of premises from a pharmaceutical list, the regulations must also make provision —
(a) requiring the Local Health Board to give notice of its intention to remove the person or entry (including provision requiring the notice to give reasons for the intended removal);
(b) about making representations.
Your change, as a redline
84 Regulations under section 83: appeals, etc
(1) Regulations under section 83 must include provision conferring on such persons as may be prescribed rights of appeal from decisions made by virtue of that section.
(2) If regulations made by virtue of section 83(6)(g) provide that a Local Health Board may refuse to grant an application on grounds corresponding to the conditions referred to in section 107(2), (3) or (4) as read with section 109, they must also provide for an appeal... to the First-tier Tribunal against the decision of the Local Health Board.
(3) Regulations under section 83 must be so framed as to preclude—
(a) a person included in a pharmaceutical list, and
(b) an employee of such a person,
from taking part in the decision whether an application such as is mentioned in section 83(2)(c) should be granted or an appeal against such a decision brought by virtue of subsection (1) of this section should be allowed.
(4) If regulations made under section 83 include provision for a Local Health Board to remove a person or an entry in respect of premises from a pharmaceutical list, the regulations must also make provision —
(a) requiring the Local Health Board to give notice of its intention to remove the person or entry (including provision requiring the notice to give reasons for the intended removal);
(b) about making representations.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.