The Police Pensions (Remediable Service) Regulations 2023
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
50 M’s entitlement to ill-health benefits to be treated as equivalent in M’s alternative scheme
(1) For the purposes of PSPJOA 2022 and these Regulations, M is to be treated as meeting the requirements for an equivalent ill-health award in M’s alternative scheme. (2) No question relating to M’s entitlement to ill-health benefits that has been decided following referral to a selected medical practitioner is to be re-opened by virtue of any provision of PSPJOA 2022 or of these Regulations. (3) In this regulation— “equivalent ill-health award in M’s alternative scheme” means— where M is entitled to an ill-health award under regulation B3 of the 1987 Regulations, a lower tier award under the reformed scheme; where M is entitled to— a lower tier award under the 2006 scheme, a lower tier award under the reformed scheme; an upper tier award under the 2006 scheme, an upper tier award under the reformed scheme; where M is entitled to— a lower tier award under the reformed scheme, and— M’s legacy scheme is the 1987 scheme, an award under regulation B3 of the 1987 Regulations; M’s legacy scheme is the 2006 scheme, a lower tier award under that scheme; an upper tier award under the reformed scheme and M’s legacy scheme is the 2006 scheme, an upper tier award under that scheme; “lower tier award” means, in relation to— the 2006 scheme, an award determined in accordance with regulation 29(3) of the 2006 Regulations; the reformed scheme, an ill-health pension payable under regulation 102(3)(a) of the 2015 Regulations; “upper tier award” means, in relation to— the 2006 scheme, an award determined in accordance with regulation 29(4) of the 2006 Regulations; the reformed scheme, an ill-health pension payable under regulation 102(3)(b) of the 2015 Regulations.
50 M’s entitlement to ill-health benefits to be treated as equivalent in M’s alternative scheme
(1) For the purposes of PSPJOA 2022 and these Regulations, M is to be treated as meeting the requirements for an equivalent ill-health award in M’s alternative scheme. (2) No question relating to M’s entitlement to ill-health benefits that has been decided following referral to a selected medical practitioner is to be re-opened by virtue of any provision of PSPJOA 2022 or of these Regulations. (3) In this regulation— “equivalent ill-health award in M’s alternative scheme” means— where M is entitled to an ill-health award under regulation B3 of the 1987 Regulations, a lower tier award under the reformed scheme; where M is entitled to— a lower tier award under the 2006 scheme, a lower tier award under the reformed scheme; an upper tier award under the 2006 scheme, an upper tier award under the reformed scheme; where M is entitled to— a lower tier award under the reformed scheme, and— M’s legacy scheme is the 1987 scheme, an award under regulation B3 of the 1987 Regulations; M’s legacy scheme is the 2006 scheme, a lower tier award under that scheme; an upper tier award under the reformed scheme and M’s legacy scheme is the 2006 scheme, an upper tier award under that scheme; “lower tier award” means, in relation to— the 2006 scheme, an award determined in accordance with regulation 29(3) of the 2006 Regulations; the reformed scheme, an ill-health pension payable under regulation 102(3)(a) of the 2015 Regulations; “upper tier award” means, in relation to— the 2006 scheme, an award determined in accordance with regulation 29(4) of the 2006 Regulations; the reformed scheme, an ill-health pension payable under regulation 102(3)(b) of the 2015 Regulations.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.