The Police Pensions (Remediable Service) Regulations 2023
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
6 Election in relation to opted-out service
(1) An election (an “opted-out service election”) may be made in relation to M’s relevant opted-out service in accordance with this Chapter and section 5 of PSPJOA 2022. (2) An opted-out service election may be made— (a) by M, or (b) where M is deceased, by the eligible decision-maker determined in accordance with the Schedule. (3) Where a person (“P”) other than the scheme manager is the opted-out service decision-maker, an opted-out service election may only be made after the scheme manager determines an application which is— (a) made by or on behalf of M, (b) in a form and manner determined by the scheme manager, (c) received by the scheme manager during the period of 12 months beginning with the day on which a remediable service statement is provided in relation to M under regulation 4(2)(a), and (d) accompanied by such information— (i) which is information within P’s possession, or (ii) which P may reasonably be expected to obtain, that the scheme manager may by written notice require P to provide in relation to the decision which caused the service in question to become opted-out service. (4) As soon as is reasonably practicable after receipt of an application, the scheme manager must— (a) determine whether an opted-out service election may be made in relation to M, and (b) notify the person who made the application whether such an opted-out service election may be made. (5) The scheme manager must refuse an application unless both of the following conditions are met— (a) the decision by virtue of which M’s service became opted-out service was communicated to the scheme manager on or after 12th March 2012, and (b) the decision by virtue of which M’s service became opted-out service was made pursuant to a relevant breach of a non-discrimination rule. (6) But the scheme manager must not refuse an application where the decision by virtue of which M’s service became opted-out service was communicated to the scheme manager during the period— (a) beginning on the day six months before M would have (but for the opt-out decision) become a member of the reformed scheme, and (b) ending at the end of 28th February 2022. (7) Where the scheme manager is the opted-out service decision-maker, the scheme manager must, as soon as is reasonably practicable after determining that they are the opted-out service decision-maker, determine whether to make an opted-out service election in relation to M. (8) An opted-out service election to be made by— (a) a person other than the scheme manager is made when the person confirms that an opted-out service election is to be made following receipt of the notification mentioned in paragraph (4)(b); (b) the scheme manager is made at the time determined by the scheme manager. (9) See section 5(2) to (4) of PSPJOA 2022 about the effect, timing and irrevocability of an opted-out service election.
6 Election in relation to opted-out service
(1) An election (an “opted-out service election”) may be made in relation to M’s relevant opted-out service in accordance with this Chapter and section 5 of PSPJOA 2022. (2) An opted-out service election may be made— (a) by M, or (b) where M is deceased, by the eligible decision-maker determined in accordance with the Schedule. (3) Where a person (“P”) other than the scheme manager is the opted-out service decision-maker, an opted-out service election may only be made after the scheme manager determines an application which is— (a) made by or on behalf of M, (b) in a form and manner determined by the scheme manager, (c) received by the scheme manager during the period of 12 months beginning with the day on which a remediable service statement is provided in relation to M under regulation 4(2)(a), and (d) accompanied by such information— (i) which is information within P’s possession, or (ii) which P may reasonably be expected to obtain, that the scheme manager may by written notice require P to provide in relation to the decision which caused the service in question to become opted-out service. (4) As soon as is reasonably practicable after receipt of an application, the scheme manager must— (a) determine whether an opted-out service election may be made in relation to M, and (b) notify the person who made the application whether such an opted-out service election may be made. (5) The scheme manager must refuse an application unless both of the following conditions are met— (a) the decision by virtue of which M’s service became opted-out service was communicated to the scheme manager on or after 12th March 2012, and (b) the decision by virtue of which M’s service became opted-out service was made pursuant to a relevant breach of a non-discrimination rule. (6) But the scheme manager must not refuse an application where the decision by virtue of which M’s service became opted-out service was communicated to the scheme manager during the period— (a) beginning on the day six months before M would have (but for the opt-out decision) become a member of the reformed scheme, and (b) ending at the end of 28th February 2022. (7) Where the scheme manager is the opted-out service decision-maker, the scheme manager must, as soon as is reasonably practicable after determining that they are the opted-out service decision-maker, determine whether to make an opted-out service election in relation to M. (8) An opted-out service election to be made by— (a) a person other than the scheme manager is made when the person confirms that an opted-out service election is to be made following receipt of the notification mentioned in paragraph (4)(b); (b) the scheme manager is made at the time determined by the scheme manager. (9) See section 5(2) to (4) of PSPJOA 2022 about the effect, timing and irrevocability of an opted-out service election.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.