Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
125 Appeal by proprietor against other decisions of Secretary of State
(1) The proprietor of an institution may appeal to the Tribunal against a decision of the Secretary of State in relation to the institution under—
(a) section 99(2) (standards not likely to be met on registration),
(b) section 104(1) (refusal to approve a material change),
(c) section 116(1)(a) (imposition of relevant restriction on proprietor), or
(d) section 118(5)(b) (refusal to vary or revoke a relevant restriction).
(2) Any appeal under this section must be brought within the period of 28 days beginning with the day on which notice of the decision is served on the proprietor.
(3) On an appeal under subsection (1)(a), the Tribunal may—
(a) confirm the decision, or
(b) require the Secretary of State to reconsider the decision, taking into account, amongst other things, the findings of the Tribunal on the appeal.
(4) Section 99(3) and (4) applies in relation to the Secretary of State's decision on reconsideration under subsection (3)(b) above as it applies to a decision made under section 99(2).
(5) On an appeal under subsection (1)(b) the Tribunal may—
(a) confirm the decision, or
(b) itself approve the change.
(6) On an appeal under subsection (1)(c), the Tribunal may—
(a) confirm the decision,
(b) direct that the relevant restriction is to cease to have effect, or
(c) direct that the relevant restriction is to cease to have effect and make an order imposing a different relevant restriction on the proprietor.
(7) On an appeal under subsection (1)(d), the Tribunal may—
(a) confirm the refusal, or
(b) if the Tribunal is satisfied that it is appropriate to do so because of a change of circumstance since the restriction in question was imposed—
(i) direct that the relevant restriction is to cease to have effect, or
(ii) direct that the relevant restriction is to cease to have effect and make an order imposing a different relevant restriction on the proprietor.
Your change, as a redline
125 Appeal by proprietor against other decisions of Secretary of State
(1) The proprietor of an institution may appeal to the Tribunal against a decision of the Secretary of State in relation to the institution under—
(a) section 99(2) (standards not likely to be met on registration),
(b) section 104(1) (refusal to approve a material change),
(c) section 116(1)(a) (imposition of relevant restriction on proprietor), or
(d) section 118(5)(b) (refusal to vary or revoke a relevant restriction).
(2) Any appeal under this section must be brought within the period of 28 days beginning with the day on which notice of the decision is served on the proprietor.
(3) On an appeal under subsection (1)(a), the Tribunal may—
(a) confirm the decision, or
(b) require the Secretary of State to reconsider the decision, taking into account, amongst other things, the findings of the Tribunal on the appeal.
(4) Section 99(3) and (4) applies in relation to the Secretary of State's decision on reconsideration under subsection (3)(b) above as it applies to a decision made under section 99(2).
(5) On an appeal under subsection (1)(b) the Tribunal may—
(a) confirm the decision, or
(b) itself approve the change.
(6) On an appeal under subsection (1)(c), the Tribunal may—
(a) confirm the decision,
(b) direct that the relevant restriction is to cease to have effect, or
(c) direct that the relevant restriction is to cease to have effect and make an order imposing a different relevant restriction on the proprietor.
(7) On an appeal under subsection (1)(d), the Tribunal may—
(a) confirm the refusal, or
(b) if the Tribunal is satisfied that it is appropriate to do so because of a change of circumstance since the restriction in question was imposed—
(i) direct that the relevant restriction is to cease to have effect, or
(ii) direct that the relevant restriction is to cease to have effect and make an order imposing a different relevant restriction on the proprietor.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.