Agriculture (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
15 Recovery of farm capital grants made by reference to false or misleading information.
(1) With a view to enabling the appropriate Minister to recover payments made by way of grant by virtue of section 29 of the Agriculture Act 1970 if it appears to him that the person on whose application any such payment was made gave false or misleading information, section 29(4) of that Act shall be amended as follows— (a) in paragraph (c) for the words “was made (hereafter in this subsection referred to as “the applicant")" there shall be substituted the words “or for the making of any payment was made", and after the words “the giving of the approval" there shall be inserted the words “or the making of the payment"; (b) for the words “equal to that payment" there shall be substituted the words “equal to the payment which has been so made"; and (c) for paragraphs (i) to (iii) there shall be substituted— (i) shall give to the person to whom any payment by way of grant would be payable, or from whom any such amount would be recoverable, a written notification of the reasons for the action proposed to be taken by the Minister; (ii) shall afford that person an opportunity of appearing before and being heard by a person appointed for the purpose by the appropriate Minister; and (iii) shall consider the report by a person so appointed and supply a copy of the report to the person mentioned in paragraph (i) above. . (2) The preceding subsection shall not have effect as regards information given before the passing of this Act.
15 Recovery of farm capital grants made by reference to false or misleading information.
(1) With a view to enabling the appropriate Minister to recover payments made by way of grant by virtue of section 29 of the Agriculture Act 1970 if it appears to him that the person on whose application any such payment was made gave false or misleading information, section 29(4) of that Act shall be amended as follows— (a) in paragraph (c) for the words “was made (hereafter in this subsection referred to as “the applicant")" there shall be substituted the words “or for the making of any payment was made", and after the words “the giving of the approval" there shall be inserted the words “or the making of the payment"; (b) for the words “equal to that payment" there shall be substituted the words “equal to the payment which has been so made"; and (c) for paragraphs (i) to (iii) there shall be substituted— (i) shall give to the person to whom any payment by way of grant would be payable, or from whom any such amount would be recoverable, a written notification of the reasons for the action proposed to be taken by the Minister; (ii) shall afford that person an opportunity of appearing before and being heard by a person appointed for the purpose by the appropriate Minister; and (iii) shall consider the report by a person so appointed and supply a copy of the report to the person mentioned in paragraph (i) above. . (2) The preceding subsection shall not have effect as regards information given before the passing of this Act.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.