Counter-Terrorism Act 2008
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
95 Meaning of “service court” and “service offence”
(1) In this Act “service court” means the Court Martial, the Service Civilian Court or the Court Martial Appeal Court. (2) Until the commencement of the relevant provisions of the Armed Forces Act 2006 (c. 52), the following is substituted for subsection (1)— (1) In this Act “service court” means— (a) a court-martial constituted under the Army Act 1955 (3 & 4 Eliz. 2 c. 18), the Air Force Act 1955 (3 & 4 Eliz. 2 c. 19) or the Naval Discipline Act 1957 (c. 53); (b) the Courts-Martial Appeal Court; or (c) a Standing Civilian Court. . (3) In this Act “service offence” means an offence under— (a) section 42 of the Armed Forces Act 2006, (b) section 70 of the Army Act 1955 or the Air Force Act 1955, or (c) section 42 of the Naval Discipline Act 1957. (4) References in this Act to the “corresponding civil offence” in relation to a service offence are— (a) in relation to an offence under section 42 of the Armed Forces Act 2006, to the corresponding offence under the law of England and Wales within the meaning of that section; (b) in relation to an offence under section 70 of the Army Act 1955 or the Air Force Act 1955, to the corresponding civil offence within the meaning of that Act; (c) in relation to an offence under section 42 of the Naval Discipline Act 1957, to the civil offence within the meaning of that section. (5) Section 48 of the Armed Forces Act 2006 (c. 52) (supplementary provisions relating to ancillary service offences) applies for the purposes of subsection (4)(a) above as it applies for the purposes of the provisions of that Act referred to in subsection (3)(b) of that section.
95 Meaning of “service court” and “service offence”
(1) In this Act “service court” means the Court Martial, the Service Civilian Court or the Court Martial Appeal Court. (2) Until the commencement of the relevant provisions of the Armed Forces Act 2006 (c. 52), the following is substituted for subsection (1)— (1) In this Act “service court” means— (a) a court-martial constituted under the Army Act 1955 (3 & 4 Eliz. 2 c. 18), the Air Force Act 1955 (3 & 4 Eliz. 2 c. 19) or the Naval Discipline Act 1957 (c. 53); (b) the Courts-Martial Appeal Court; or (c) a Standing Civilian Court. . (3) In this Act “service offence” means an offence under— (a) section 42 of the Armed Forces Act 2006, (b) section 70 of the Army Act 1955 or the Air Force Act 1955, or (c) section 42 of the Naval Discipline Act 1957. (4) References in this Act to the “corresponding civil offence” in relation to a service offence are— (a) in relation to an offence under section 42 of the Armed Forces Act 2006, to the corresponding offence under the law of England and Wales within the meaning of that section; (b) in relation to an offence under section 70 of the Army Act 1955 or the Air Force Act 1955, to the corresponding civil offence within the meaning of that Act; (c) in relation to an offence under section 42 of the Naval Discipline Act 1957, to the civil offence within the meaning of that section. (5) Section 48 of the Armed Forces Act 2006 (c. 52) (supplementary provisions relating to ancillary service offences) applies for the purposes of subsection (4)(a) above as it applies for the purposes of the provisions of that Act referred to in subsection (3)(b) of that section.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.