Divorce (Religious Marriages) Act 2002
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
1 Power to refuse decree absolute if steps not taken to dissolve religious marriage
(1) In the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (c. 18), insert— Proceedings after decree nisi: religious marriage 10A (1) This section applies if a decree of divorce has been granted but not made absolute and the parties to the marriage concerned— (a) were married in accordance with— (i) the usages of the Jews, or (ii) any other prescribed religious usages; and (b) must co-operate if the marriage is to be dissolved in accordance with those usages. (2) On the application of either party, the court may order that a decree of divorce is not to be made absolute until a declaration made by both parties that they have taken such steps as are required to dissolve the marriage in accordance with those usages is produced to the court. (3) An order under subsection (2)— (a) may be made only if the court is satisfied that in all the circumstances of the case it is just and reasonable to do so; and (b) may be revoked at any time. (4) A declaration of a kind mentioned in subsection (2)— (a) must be in a specified form; (b) must, in specified cases, be accompanied by such documents as may be specified; and (c) must, in specified cases, satisfy such other requirements as may be specified. (5) The validity of a decree of divorce made by reference to such a declaration is not to be affected by any inaccuracy in that declaration. (6) “Prescribed” means prescribed in an order made by the Lord Chancellor and such an order— (a) must be made by statutory instrument; (b) shall be subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament. (7) “Specified” means specified in rules of court. (2) Subsections (3) and (4) of section 9 of the Family Law Act 1996 (c. 27) (arrangements on divorce: religious marriages) are repealed.
1 Power to refuse decree absolute if steps not taken to dissolve religious marriage
(1) In the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (c. 18), insert— Proceedings after decree nisi: religious marriage 10A (1) This section applies if a decree of divorce has been granted but not made absolute and the parties to the marriage concerned— (a) were married in accordance with— (i) the usages of the Jews, or (ii) any other prescribed religious usages; and (b) must co-operate if the marriage is to be dissolved in accordance with those usages. (2) On the application of either party, the court may order that a decree of divorce is not to be made absolute until a declaration made by both parties that they have taken such steps as are required to dissolve the marriage in accordance with those usages is produced to the court. (3) An order under subsection (2)— (a) may be made only if the court is satisfied that in all the circumstances of the case it is just and reasonable to do so; and (b) may be revoked at any time. (4) A declaration of a kind mentioned in subsection (2)— (a) must be in a specified form; (b) must, in specified cases, be accompanied by such documents as may be specified; and (c) must, in specified cases, satisfy such other requirements as may be specified. (5) The validity of a decree of divorce made by reference to such a declaration is not to be affected by any inaccuracy in that declaration. (6) “Prescribed” means prescribed in an order made by the Lord Chancellor and such an order— (a) must be made by statutory instrument; (b) shall be subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament. (7) “Specified” means specified in rules of court. (2) Subsections (3) and (4) of section 9 of the Family Law Act 1996 (c. 27) (arrangements on divorce: religious marriages) are repealed.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.