Consumer Rights Act 2015
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
47 Liability that cannot be excluded or restricted
(1) A term of a contract to supply digital content is not binding on the consumer to the extent that it would exclude or restrict the trader's liability arising under any of these provisions— (a) section 34 (digital content to be of satisfactory quality), (b) section 35 (digital content to be fit for particular purpose), (c) section 36 (digital content to be as described), (d) section 37 (other pre-contract information included in contract), or (e) section 41 (trader's right to supply digital content). (2) That also means that a term of a contract to supply digital content is not binding on the consumer to the extent that it would— (a) exclude or restrict a right or remedy in respect of a liability under a provision listed in subsection (1), (b) make such a right or remedy or its enforcement subject to a restrictive or onerous condition, (c) allow a trader to put a person at a disadvantage as a result of pursuing such a right or remedy, or (d) exclude or restrict rules of evidence or procedure. (3) The reference in subsection (1) to excluding or restricting a liability also includes preventing an obligation or duty arising or limiting its extent. (4) An agreement in writing to submit present or future differences to arbitration is not to be regarded as excluding or restricting any liability for the purposes of this section. (5) See Schedule 3 for provision about the enforcement of this section. (6) For provision limiting the ability of a trader under a contract within section 46 to exclude or restrict the trader's liability under that section, see section 62.
47 Liability that cannot be excluded or restricted
(1) A term of a contract to supply digital content is not binding on the consumer to the extent that it would exclude or restrict the trader's liability arising under any of these provisions— (a) section 34 (digital content to be of satisfactory quality), (b) section 35 (digital content to be fit for particular purpose), (c) section 36 (digital content to be as described), (d) section 37 (other pre-contract information included in contract), or (e) section 41 (trader's right to supply digital content). (2) That also means that a term of a contract to supply digital content is not binding on the consumer to the extent that it would— (a) exclude or restrict a right or remedy in respect of a liability under a provision listed in subsection (1), (b) make such a right or remedy or its enforcement subject to a restrictive or onerous condition, (c) allow a trader to put a person at a disadvantage as a result of pursuing such a right or remedy, or (d) exclude or restrict rules of evidence or procedure. (3) The reference in subsection (1) to excluding or restricting a liability also includes preventing an obligation or duty arising or limiting its extent. (4) An agreement in writing to submit present or future differences to arbitration is not to be regarded as excluding or restricting any liability for the purposes of this section. (5) See Schedule 3 for provision about the enforcement of this section. (6) For provision limiting the ability of a trader under a contract within section 46 to exclude or restrict the trader's liability under that section, see section 62.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.