Propose a change

Finance Act 2004

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

246 Restriction of deduction for non-contributory provision

(1) This section applies in relation to an employer’s expenses of providing benefits to or in respect of present or former employees under an employer-financed retirement benefits scheme in a case where— (a) the expenses do not consist of the making of contributions under the scheme, but (b) in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice they are shown in the employer’s accounts. (2) Unless the benefits are ones in respect of which a person is, on receipt, chargeable to income tax, the expenses— (a) are not deductible in computing the amount of the profits of the employer for the purposes of Part 2 of ITTOIA 2005 or Part 3 of CTA 2009 (trading income), (b) are not expenses of management of the employer for the purposes of Chapter 2 of Part 16 of CTA 2009 (expenses of management: companies with investment business), and (c) are not to count as ordinary BLAGAB management expenses of the employer for an accounting period for the purposes of section 76 of FA 2012. (3) But where the benefits are ones in respect of which a person is, on receipt, chargeable to income tax— (a) if the expenses are allowed to be deducted in computing the amount of the profits of the employer to be charged under Part 2 of ITTOIA 2005 or Part 3 of CTA 2009 (trading income), they are deductible in computing the amount of the profits for the period of account in which they are paid, and (b) for the purposes of the operation in relation to the employer of section 76 of FA 2012 or Chapter 2 of Part 16 of CTA 2009, the expenses are referable to the accounting period in which they are paid. (4) In this section “employer-financed retirement benefits scheme” has the same meaning as in Chapter 2 of Part 6 of ITEPA 2003 (see section 393A of that Act).

Your change, as a redline

246 Restriction of deduction for non-contributory provision

(1) This section applies in relation to an employer’s expenses of providing benefits to or in respect of present or former employees under an employer-financed retirement benefits scheme in a case where— (a) the expenses do not consist of the making of contributions under the scheme, but (b) in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice they are shown in the employer’s accounts. (2) Unless the benefits are ones in respect of which a person is, on receipt, chargeable to income tax, the expenses— (a) are not deductible in computing the amount of the profits of the employer for the purposes of Part 2 of ITTOIA 2005 or Part 3 of CTA 2009 (trading income), (b) are not expenses of management of the employer for the purposes of Chapter 2 of Part 16 of CTA 2009 (expenses of management: companies with investment business), and (c) are not to count as ordinary BLAGAB management expenses of the employer for an accounting period for the purposes of section 76 of FA 2012. (3) But where the benefits are ones in respect of which a person is, on receipt, chargeable to income tax— (a) if the expenses are allowed to be deducted in computing the amount of the profits of the employer to be charged under Part 2 of ITTOIA 2005 or Part 3 of CTA 2009 (trading income), they are deductible in computing the amount of the profits for the period of account in which they are paid, and (b) for the purposes of the operation in relation to the employer of section 76 of FA 2012 or Chapter 2 of Part 16 of CTA 2009, the expenses are referable to the accounting period in which they are paid. (4) In this section “employer-financed retirement benefits scheme” has the same meaning as in Chapter 2 of Part 6 of ITEPA 2003 (see section 393A of that Act).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds