Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
62 Treatment of sums deducted
(1) A sum deducted under section 61 from a payment made by a contractor—
(a) must be paid to the Board of Inland Revenue, and
(b) is to be treated for the purposes of income tax or, as the case may be, corporation tax as not diminishing the amount of the payment.
(2) If the sub-contractor is not a company a sum deducted under section 61 and paid to the Board is to be treated as being income tax paid in respect of the sub-contractor’s relevant profits.
If the sum is more than sufficient to discharge his liability to income tax in respect of those profits, so much of the excess as is required to discharge any liability of his for Class 4 contributions is to be treated as being Class 4 contributions paid in respect of those profits.
(3) If the sub-contractor is a company—
(a) a sum deducted under section 61 and paid to the Board is to be treated, in accordance with regulations, as paid on account of any relevant liabilities of the sub-contractor;
(b) regulations must provide for the sum to be applied in discharging relevant liabilities of the year of assessment in which the deduction is made;
(c) if the amount is more than sufficient to discharge the sub-contractor’s relevant liabilities, the excess may be treated, in accordance with the regulations, as being corporation tax paid in respect of the sub-contractor’s relevant profits; and
(d) regulations must provide for the repayment to the sub-contractor of any amount not required for the purposes mentioned in paragraphs (b) and (c).
(3A) Regulations under subsection (3) may include provision authorising an officer of Revenue and Customs to—
(a) correct an error or omission relating to a set-off claim;
(b) remove a set-off claim;
(c) prohibit a person from making a further set-off claim, for a specified period or indefinitely.
(3B) Regulations under subsection (3) that include provision of the kind mentioned in subsection (3A) may, for example, include provision—
(a) allowing the things mentioned in subsection (3A)(a) to (c) to be done by amending a return (including a return not made under the regulations) or otherwise;
(b) allowing a set-off claim to be removed where the claimant is not eligible to make the claim (including where the claimant is not a company, not a sub-contractor, or is registered for gross payment);
(c) requiring information to be given to the Commissioners of Revenue and Customs, at such times as may be specified in the regulations.
(3C) In subsections (3A) and (3B), “set-off claim” means a claim for treating a sum deducted under section 61 as paid on account of any relevant liabilities.
(4) For the purposes of this section the “relevant liabilities”of a sub-contractor are any liabilities of the sub-contractor, whether arising before or after the deduction is made, to make a payment to the Inland Revenue in pursuance of an obligation as an employer or contractor.
(5) In this section—
(a) “the sub-contractor” means the person for whose labour (or for whose employees' or officers' labour) the payment is made;
(b) references to the sub-contractor’s “relevant profits” are to the profits from the trade, profession or vocation carried on by him in the course of which the payment was received;
(c) “Class 4 contributions” means Class 4 contributions within the meaning of the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992 (c. 4) or the Social Security Contributions and Benefits (Northern Ireland) Act 1992 (c. 7).
(6) References in this section to regulations are to regulations made by the Board of Inland Revenue.
(7) Regulations under this section may contain such supplementary, incidental or consequential provision as appears to the Board to be appropriate.
Your change, as a redline
62 Treatment of sums deducted
(1) A sum deducted under section 61 from a payment made by a contractor—
(a) must be paid to the Board of Inland Revenue, and
(b) is to be treated for the purposes of income tax or, as the case may be, corporation tax as not diminishing the amount of the payment.
(2) If the sub-contractor is not a company a sum deducted under section 61 and paid to the Board is to be treated as being income tax paid in respect of the sub-contractor’s relevant profits.
If the sum is more than sufficient to discharge his liability to income tax in respect of those profits, so much of the excess as is required to discharge any liability of his for Class 4 contributions is to be treated as being Class 4 contributions paid in respect of those profits.
(3) If the sub-contractor is a company—
(a) a sum deducted under section 61 and paid to the Board is to be treated, in accordance with regulations, as paid on account of any relevant liabilities of the sub-contractor;
(b) regulations must provide for the sum to be applied in discharging relevant liabilities of the year of assessment in which the deduction is made;
(c) if the amount is more than sufficient to discharge the sub-contractor’s relevant liabilities, the excess may be treated, in accordance with the regulations, as being corporation tax paid in respect of the sub-contractor’s relevant profits; and
(d) regulations must provide for the repayment to the sub-contractor of any amount not required for the purposes mentioned in paragraphs (b) and (c).
(3A) Regulations under subsection (3) may include provision authorising an officer of Revenue and Customs to—
(a) correct an error or omission relating to a set-off claim;
(b) remove a set-off claim;
(c) prohibit a person from making a further set-off claim, for a specified period or indefinitely.
(3B) Regulations under subsection (3) that include provision of the kind mentioned in subsection (3A) may, for example, include provision—
(a) allowing the things mentioned in subsection (3A)(a) to (c) to be done by amending a return (including a return not made under the regulations) or otherwise;
(b) allowing a set-off claim to be removed where the claimant is not eligible to make the claim (including where the claimant is not a company, not a sub-contractor, or is registered for gross payment);
(c) requiring information to be given to the Commissioners of Revenue and Customs, at such times as may be specified in the regulations.
(3C) In subsections (3A) and (3B), “set-off claim” means a claim for treating a sum deducted under section 61 as paid on account of any relevant liabilities.
(4) For the purposes of this section the “relevant liabilities”of a sub-contractor are any liabilities of the sub-contractor, whether arising before or after the deduction is made, to make a payment to the Inland Revenue in pursuance of an obligation as an employer or contractor.
(5) In this section—
(a) “the sub-contractor” means the person for whose labour (or for whose employees' or officers' labour) the payment is made;
(b) references to the sub-contractor’s “relevant profits” are to the profits from the trade, profession or vocation carried on by him in the course of which the payment was received;
(c) “Class 4 contributions” means Class 4 contributions within the meaning of the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992 (c. 4) or the Social Security Contributions and Benefits (Northern Ireland) Act 1992 (c. 7).
(6) References in this section to regulations are to regulations made by the Board of Inland Revenue.
(7) Regulations under this section may contain such supplementary, incidental or consequential provision as appears to the Board to be appropriate.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.