Propose a change

State Pension Credit Act 2002

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

6 Duty to specify assessed income period for pre-6 April 2016 awards

(1) In any case falling within subsection (3) or (4) where the relevant decision takes effect before 6 April 2016, the Secretary of State shall, on the making of the relevant decision, specify a period as the assessed income period, unless prevented by subsection (2). (2) The Secretary of State is prevented from specifying a period as the assessed income period under subsection (1)— (a) if the relevant decision takes effect at a time when an assessed income period is in force in the case of the claimant by virtue of a previous application of this section; or (b) in such other circumstances as may be prescribed. (3) The first case is where— (a) the Secretary of State determines the amount of a claimant’s income for the purposes of a decision relating to state pension credit; (b) the decision is a decision under section 8(1), 9 or 10 of the Social Security Act 1998 (c. 14) (decisions on claims etc, and decisions revising or superseding decisions); (c) the decision takes effect on or after— (i) the day on which the claimant attains the age of 65; or (ii) if earlier, in a case where the claimant is a member of a couple , the day on which the other member of the couple attains that age; and (d) the decision is not to the effect that the claimant is not entitled to state pension credit. (4) The second case is where— (a) the amount of the claimant’s income is determined on, or for the purposes of, an appeal against a decision that the claimant is not entitled to state pension credit; (b) on the appeal, it is decided that the claimant is entitled to state pension credit; and (c) the decision takes effect as mentioned in subsection (3)(c). (5) In this section “the relevant decision” means— (a) so far as relating to the first case, the decision mentioned in subsection (3)(a); (b) so far as relating to the second case, the decision on appeal mentioned in subsection (4)(b). (6) This section is subject to section 9. (7) This section and sections 7 to 10 shall be construed as one.

Your change, as a redline

6 Duty to specify assessed income period for pre-6 April 2016 awards

(1) In any case falling within subsection (3) or (4) where the relevant decision takes effect before 6 April 2016, the Secretary of State shall, on the making of the relevant decision, specify a period as the assessed income period, unless prevented by subsection (2). (2) The Secretary of State is prevented from specifying a period as the assessed income period under subsection (1)— (a) if the relevant decision takes effect at a time when an assessed income period is in force in the case of the claimant by virtue of a previous application of this section; or (b) in such other circumstances as may be prescribed. (3) The first case is where— (a) the Secretary of State determines the amount of a claimant’s income for the purposes of a decision relating to state pension credit; (b) the decision is a decision under section 8(1), 9 or 10 of the Social Security Act 1998 (c. 14) (decisions on claims etc, and decisions revising or superseding decisions); (c) the decision takes effect on or after— (i) the day on which the claimant attains the age of 65; or (ii) if earlier, in a case where the claimant is a member of a couple , the day on which the other member of the couple attains that age; and (d) the decision is not to the effect that the claimant is not entitled to state pension credit. (4) The second case is where— (a) the amount of the claimant’s income is determined on, or for the purposes of, an appeal against a decision that the claimant is not entitled to state pension credit; (b) on the appeal, it is decided that the claimant is entitled to state pension credit; and (c) the decision takes effect as mentioned in subsection (3)(c). (5) In this section “the relevant decision” means— (a) so far as relating to the first case, the decision mentioned in subsection (3)(a); (b) so far as relating to the second case, the decision on appeal mentioned in subsection (4)(b). (6) This section is subject to section 9. (7) This section and sections 7 to 10 shall be construed as one.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds