The Court and Tribunal Fees (Miscellaneous Amendments) Order 2026
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
12 Amendment of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fees Order 2013
(1) The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fees Order 2013 is amended as follows. (2) In article 3 (definitions), after the definition of “the 2013 Rules”, insert— “application”, in article 4 and Schedule 1, includes the bringing of an appeal to the Tribunal; . (3) In article 4 (fees payable)— (a) in paragraph (1), for “Proceedings where” substitute “Applications in respect of which”; (b) in paragraph (2), for “The fee” substitute “The application fee”; (c) after paragraph (2), insert— (2A) Where an application is made under two or more provisions, the application fee payable is the highest application fee that would have been payable if a separate application had been made under each of the provisions. (2B) The hearing fee due is set out in column 3 of that Schedule. (2C) Where two or more applications are joined for the purposes of a single hearing, the hearing fee payable is the highest hearing fee that would be payable if a separate hearing were held for each of the applications. ; (d) in paragraph (3), for “Any fee payable for an application under fees 1.1 to 1.12” substitute “Any application fee payable”; (e) in paragraph (4), for “Any fee payable under fees 2.1 or 2.2” substitute “Any hearing fee payable”. (4) In article 6(2) (fees: split hearings), for “fee”, in the second place it occurs, substitute “hearing fee”. (5) In article 8(3) (fees: apportionment of liability for fees in cases involving more than one applicant), for “proceedings are brought” substitute “an application is made”. (6) For Schedule 1 (fees to be taken), substitute the Schedule set out in Schedule 6 to this Order.
12 Amendment of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fees Order 2013
(1) The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fees Order 2013 is amended as follows. (2) In article 3 (definitions), after the definition of “the 2013 Rules”, insert— “application”, in article 4 and Schedule 1, includes the bringing of an appeal to the Tribunal; . (3) In article 4 (fees payable)— (a) in paragraph (1), for “Proceedings where” substitute “Applications in respect of which”; (b) in paragraph (2), for “The fee” substitute “The application fee”; (c) after paragraph (2), insert— (2A) Where an application is made under two or more provisions, the application fee payable is the highest application fee that would have been payable if a separate application had been made under each of the provisions. (2B) The hearing fee due is set out in column 3 of that Schedule. (2C) Where two or more applications are joined for the purposes of a single hearing, the hearing fee payable is the highest hearing fee that would be payable if a separate hearing were held for each of the applications. ; (d) in paragraph (3), for “Any fee payable for an application under fees 1.1 to 1.12” substitute “Any application fee payable”; (e) in paragraph (4), for “Any fee payable under fees 2.1 or 2.2” substitute “Any hearing fee payable”. (4) In article 6(2) (fees: split hearings), for “fee”, in the second place it occurs, substitute “hearing fee”. (5) In article 8(3) (fees: apportionment of liability for fees in cases involving more than one applicant), for “proceedings are brought” substitute “an application is made”. (6) For Schedule 1 (fees to be taken), substitute the Schedule set out in Schedule 6 to this Order.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.