Propose a change

Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

184 Infringement of performer’s rights by importing, possessing or dealing with illicit recording.

(1) A performer’s rights are infringed by a person who, without his consent— (a) imports into the United Kingdom otherwise than for his private and domestic use, or (b) in the course of a business possesses, sells or lets for hire, offers or exposes for sale or hire, or distributes, a recording of a qualifying performance which is, and which that person knows or has reason to believe is, an illicit recording. (2) Where in an action for infringement of a performer’s rights brought by virtue of this section a defendant shows that the illicit recording was innocently acquired by him or a predecessor in title of his, the only remedy available against him in respect of the infringement is damages not exceeding a reasonable payment in respect of the act complained of. (3) In subsection (2) “innocently acquired” means that the person acquiring the recording did not know and had no reason to believe that it was an illicit recording.

Your change, as a redline

184 Infringement of performer’s rights by importing, possessing or dealing with illicit recording.

(1) A performer’s rights are infringed by a person who, without his consent— (a) imports into the United Kingdom otherwise than for his private and domestic use, or (b) in the course of a business possesses, sells or lets for hire, offers or exposes for sale or hire, or distributes, a recording of a qualifying performance which is, and which that person knows or has reason to believe is, an illicit recording. (2) Where in an action for infringement of a performer’s rights brought by virtue of this section a defendant shows that the illicit recording was innocently acquired by him or a predecessor in title of his, the only remedy available against him in respect of the infringement is damages not exceeding a reasonable payment in respect of the act complained of. (3) In subsection (2) “innocently acquired” means that the person acquiring the recording did not know and had no reason to believe that it was an illicit recording.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds