Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
59 Employees’ vehicles: withdrawal of capital allowances
(1) In Chapter 3 of Part 2 of the Capital Allowances Act 2001 (c. 2) (plant and machinery: qualifying expenditure), for section 36 (restriction on qualifying expenditure in case of employment or office) substitute—
Restriction on qualifying expenditure in case of employment or office
36 (1) Where the qualifying activity consists of an employment or office—
(a) expenditure on the provision of a mechanically propelled road vehicle, or a cycle, is not qualifying expenditure, and
(b) other expenditure is qualifying expenditure only if the plant or machinery is necessarily provided for use in the performance of the duties of the employment or office.
(2) In this section “cycle” has the meaning given by section 192(1) of the Road Traffic Act 1988.
.
(2) Section 80 of that Act (vehicles provided for purposes of employment or office) is repealed.
(3) The above amendments apply to expenditure incurred on or after 6th April 2002.
(4) Where immediately before 6th April 2002—
(a) expenditure incurred by an employee on the provision of a mechanically propelled road vehicle, or a cycle, was qualifying expenditure for the purposes of Part 2 of the Capital Allowances Act 2001 (c. 2) , and
(b) the employee is treated for the purposes of that Part as owning an asset as a result of that expenditure having been incurred,
the employee shall be treated for the purposes of that Part of that Act as if he had ceased to own the asset at that time.
(5) In subsection (4)—
“employee” includes an office-holder; and
“cycle” has the meaning given by section 192(1) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (c. 52).
Your change, as a redline
59 Employees’ vehicles: withdrawal of capital allowances
(1) In Chapter 3 of Part 2 of the Capital Allowances Act 2001 (c. 2) (plant and machinery: qualifying expenditure), for section 36 (restriction on qualifying expenditure in case of employment or office) substitute—
Restriction on qualifying expenditure in case of employment or office
36 (1) Where the qualifying activity consists of an employment or office—
(a) expenditure on the provision of a mechanically propelled road vehicle, or a cycle, is not qualifying expenditure, and
(b) other expenditure is qualifying expenditure only if the plant or machinery is necessarily provided for use in the performance of the duties of the employment or office.
(2) In this section “cycle” has the meaning given by section 192(1) of the Road Traffic Act 1988.
.
(2) Section 80 of that Act (vehicles provided for purposes of employment or office) is repealed.
(3) The above amendments apply to expenditure incurred on or after 6th April 2002.
(4) Where immediately before 6th April 2002—
(a) expenditure incurred by an employee on the provision of a mechanically propelled road vehicle, or a cycle, was qualifying expenditure for the purposes of Part 2 of the Capital Allowances Act 2001 (c. 2) , and
(b) the employee is treated for the purposes of that Part as owning an asset as a result of that expenditure having been incurred,
the employee shall be treated for the purposes of that Part of that Act as if he had ceased to own the asset at that time.
(5) In subsection (4)—
“employee” includes an office-holder; and
“cycle” has the meaning given by section 192(1) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (c. 52).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.