Propose a change

Corporation Tax Act 2010

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

1139 “Tax advantage”

(1) This section has effect for the purposes of the provisions of the Corporation Tax Acts which apply this section. (2) “Tax advantage” means— (a) a relief from tax or increased relief from tax, (b) a repayment of tax or increased repayment of tax, (c) the avoidance or reduction of a charge to tax or an assessment to tax, ... (d) the avoidance of a possible assessment to tax , ... (da) the avoidance or reduction of a charge or assessment to a charge under Part 9A of TIOPA 2010 (controlled foreign companies), or (e) the avoidance or reduction of a charge or assessment to the bank levy under Schedule 19 to FA 2011 (the bank levy) ... (f) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(c) and (d) it does not matter whether the avoidance or reduction is effected— (a) by receipts accruing in such a way that the recipient does not pay or bear tax on them, or (b) by a deduction in calculating profits or gains. (3A) The avoidance or reduction of a charge or assessment to the bank levy as a result of arrangements to which paragraph 47 of Schedule 19 to FA 2011 (bank levy: anti-avoidance) applies is to be ignored for the purposes of subsection (2)(e) to the extent that it results from arrangements, or part of arrangements, to which any of paragraph 47(7) to (12) of that Schedule applies. (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Your change, as a redline

1139 “Tax advantage”

(1) This section has effect for the purposes of the provisions of the Corporation Tax Acts which apply this section. (2) “Tax advantage” means— (a) a relief from tax or increased relief from tax, (b) a repayment of tax or increased repayment of tax, (c) the avoidance or reduction of a charge to tax or an assessment to tax, ... (d) the avoidance of a possible assessment to tax , ... (da) the avoidance or reduction of a charge or assessment to a charge under Part 9A of TIOPA 2010 (controlled foreign companies), or (e) the avoidance or reduction of a charge or assessment to the bank levy under Schedule 19 to FA 2011 (the bank levy) ... (f) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(c) and (d) it does not matter whether the avoidance or reduction is effected— (a) by receipts accruing in such a way that the recipient does not pay or bear tax on them, or (b) by a deduction in calculating profits or gains. (3A) The avoidance or reduction of a charge or assessment to the bank levy as a result of arrangements to which paragraph 47 of Schedule 19 to FA 2011 (bank levy: anti-avoidance) applies is to be ignored for the purposes of subsection (2)(e) to the extent that it results from arrangements, or part of arrangements, to which any of paragraph 47(7) to (12) of that Schedule applies. (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds