Propose a change

Corporation Tax Act 2010

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

146 Conditions 2 and 3: companies in link company's group

(1) If the claimant company makes a claim for group relief based on consortium condition 2, the amount of group relief to be given on the claim is limited by subsections (2) and (3). (2) There is a limit on the amount of group relief that can be given, in total, on consortium claims made by the link company and group companies in relation to the surrendering company's surrenderable amounts for the surrender period. (3) That limit is the maximum amount of group relief that could be given to the link company in relation to those amounts on consortium claims— (a) assuming that no consortium claims in relation to those amounts were made by group companies based on consortium condition 2, ... (aa) assuming that the link company was UK related, and (b) ignoring any lack of profits of the link company from which deductions could be made as mentioned in section 137(1). (4) If the claimant company makes a claim for group relief based on consortium condition 3, the amount of group relief to be given on the claim is limited by subsections (5) to (7). (5) There is a limit on the amount of group relief that can be given, in total, to the claimant company for the claim period on consortium claims made in relation to losses and other amounts surrendered by the link company and group companies. (6) That limit is the same as the limit that, as a result of section 144(2), would apply for the purposes of a consortium claim made by the claimant company for the claim period in relation to losses or other amounts surrendered by the link company, assuming that the link company was UK related. (7) In determining the limit that would apply as a result of section 144(2) it is to be assumed that the accounting period of the link company is the same as the accounting period of the claimant company. (8) In this section— “consortium claim” means a claim for group relief based on consortium condition 1, consortium condition 2 or consortium condition 3, ... “group company”, for the purpose of determining in accordance with this section a limitation on the amount of group relief to be given on a claim based on consortium condition 2 or consortium condition 3, means a company that is a member of the same group of companies as the link company (other than the link company itself), and “UK related”, in relation to a company, has the meaning given by section 134.

Your change, as a redline

146 Conditions 2 and 3: companies in link company's group

(1) If the claimant company makes a claim for group relief based on consortium condition 2, the amount of group relief to be given on the claim is limited by subsections (2) and (3). (2) There is a limit on the amount of group relief that can be given, in total, on consortium claims made by the link company and group companies in relation to the surrendering company's surrenderable amounts for the surrender period. (3) That limit is the maximum amount of group relief that could be given to the link company in relation to those amounts on consortium claims— (a) assuming that no consortium claims in relation to those amounts were made by group companies based on consortium condition 2, ... (aa) assuming that the link company was UK related, and (b) ignoring any lack of profits of the link company from which deductions could be made as mentioned in section 137(1). (4) If the claimant company makes a claim for group relief based on consortium condition 3, the amount of group relief to be given on the claim is limited by subsections (5) to (7). (5) There is a limit on the amount of group relief that can be given, in total, to the claimant company for the claim period on consortium claims made in relation to losses and other amounts surrendered by the link company and group companies. (6) That limit is the same as the limit that, as a result of section 144(2), would apply for the purposes of a consortium claim made by the claimant company for the claim period in relation to losses or other amounts surrendered by the link company, assuming that the link company was UK related. (7) In determining the limit that would apply as a result of section 144(2) it is to be assumed that the accounting period of the link company is the same as the accounting period of the claimant company. (8) In this section— “consortium claim” means a claim for group relief based on consortium condition 1, consortium condition 2 or consortium condition 3, ... “group company”, for the purpose of determining in accordance with this section a limitation on the amount of group relief to be given on a claim based on consortium condition 2 or consortium condition 3, means a company that is a member of the same group of companies as the link company (other than the link company itself), and “UK related”, in relation to a company, has the meaning given by section 134.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds