Propose a change

Corporation Tax Act 2010

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

181 Assumptions to be applied if non-UK resident company involved

(1) The assumptions referred to in section 180 are as follows. Assumption 1 The profit distribution or the distribution on the notional winding up is confined to a distribution of the profits or assets referable to company B's UK trade (see section 182). Assumption 2 Section 165(2) (in the case of a profit distribution) is applied on the basis that the amount of company B's total profits referred to in that subsection does not exceed the amount of those profits referable to its UK trade. Assumption 3 Section 166(3) and (4) (in the case of a distribution on a notional winding up) is applied on the basis that the amount of company B's assets and liabilities referred to in those subsections does not exceed the amount of those assets and liabilities referable to its UK trade. Assumption 4 None of the ordinary equity holders has a beneficial entitlement to the profits or assets referable to company B's UK trade that is greater than the proportion of the distribution in question to which the equity holder would be beneficially entitled— if Assumptions 1 to 3 were ignored, and if it would otherwise be less, the distribution were £100. (2) In subsection (1) “ordinary equity holder” means an equity holder whose beneficial entitlement on the profit distribution or the distribution on the notional winding up does not differ according to whether or not, or the extent to which, the profits or assets distributed are referable to company B's UK trade.

Your change, as a redline

181 Assumptions to be applied if non-UK resident company involved

(1) The assumptions referred to in section 180 are as follows. Assumption 1 The profit distribution or the distribution on the notional winding up is confined to a distribution of the profits or assets referable to company B's UK trade (see section 182). Assumption 2 Section 165(2) (in the case of a profit distribution) is applied on the basis that the amount of company B's total profits referred to in that subsection does not exceed the amount of those profits referable to its UK trade. Assumption 3 Section 166(3) and (4) (in the case of a distribution on a notional winding up) is applied on the basis that the amount of company B's assets and liabilities referred to in those subsections does not exceed the amount of those assets and liabilities referable to its UK trade. Assumption 4 None of the ordinary equity holders has a beneficial entitlement to the profits or assets referable to company B's UK trade that is greater than the proportion of the distribution in question to which the equity holder would be beneficially entitled— if Assumptions 1 to 3 were ignored, and if it would otherwise be less, the distribution were £100. (2) In subsection (1) “ordinary equity holder” means an equity holder whose beneficial entitlement on the profit distribution or the distribution on the notional winding up does not differ according to whether or not, or the extent to which, the profits or assets distributed are referable to company B's UK trade.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds