Propose a change

Corporation Tax Act 2010

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

269ZJ Exclusion of shock losses from restrictions

(1) If a shock loss is— (a) carried forward to an accounting period of an insurance company (see section 269ZP(2)), and (b) deducted under section 45B (post-1 April 2017 trade losses carried forward against trade profits), the deduction is to be treated as not falling within section 269ZB(3). (2) If a shock loss is— (a) carried forward to an accounting period of an insurance company, and (b) deducted under section 463H of CTA 2009 (carry forward of unrelieved non-trading deficit from loan relationships against non-trading profits), the company is to be treated for the purposes of sections 269ZC and 269ZD(2)(b)(ii) as not having made that deduction. (3) If an insurance company makes a deduction of (or in respect of) a shock loss, that deduction is not a “relevant deduction” for the purposes of section 269ZD (restriction on deductions from total profits). (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Your change, as a redline

269ZJ Exclusion of shock losses from restrictions

(1) If a shock loss is— (a) carried forward to an accounting period of an insurance company (see section 269ZP(2)), and (b) deducted under section 45B (post-1 April 2017 trade losses carried forward against trade profits), the deduction is to be treated as not falling within section 269ZB(3). (2) If a shock loss is— (a) carried forward to an accounting period of an insurance company, and (b) deducted under section 463H of CTA 2009 (carry forward of unrelieved non-trading deficit from loan relationships against non-trading profits), the company is to be treated for the purposes of sections 269ZC and 269ZD(2)(b)(ii) as not having made that deduction. (3) If an insurance company makes a deduction of (or in respect of) a shock loss, that deduction is not a “relevant deduction” for the purposes of section 269ZD (restriction on deductions from total profits). (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds