Propose a change

Corporation Tax Act 2010

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

269ZSA Group allowance nomination: former groups

(1) This section applies where— (a) a group ceases to be a group for the purposes of this Part (because the companies that were members of the group no longer together meet the condition in section 269ZZB(2)), and (b) immediately before the group ceased to be a group for the purposes of this Part— (i) two or more members of the group were companies within the charge to corporation tax, and (ii) no group allowance nomination under section 269ZS had effect in relation to the group. (2) All the companies that were, immediately before the group ceased to be a group for the purposes of this Part, members of the group and within the charge to corporation tax may together nominate (“the group allowance nomination”) one of their number (“the nominated company”) for the purposes of this Part. (3) It is irrelevant for the purposes of subsection (2) whether or not the companies (including the nominated company) are within the charge to corporation tax when the nomination is made. (4) A group allowance nomination under this section has effect during the period— (a) beginning with the date on which it is stated to take effect (see section 269ZS(5), as it has effect by virtue of subsection (5)(a) of this section), and (b) ending immediately before the group ceased to be a group for the purposes of this Part. (5) For the purposes of this Part, treat a group allowance nomination under this section as a group allowance nomination under section 269ZS, but that section is to apply to a group allowance nomination under this section subject to the following modifications— (a) section 269ZS(5) has effect as if, for the words in brackets, there were substituted “ (which must be earlier than the date on which the group ceased to be a group for the purposes of this Part) ”; (b) section 269ZS(6) has effect as if, for the words “is, when the nomination is made”, there were substituted “ was, immediately before the group ceased to be a group for the purposes of this Part ”; (c) section 269ZS(7) does not apply (but see subsection (4) of this section); (d) in section 269ZS(8), ignore references to the revocation of a group allowance nomination (however expressed). (6) Only one group allowance nomination under this section may be made in respect of a group.

Your change, as a redline

269ZSA Group allowance nomination: former groups

(1) This section applies where— (a) a group ceases to be a group for the purposes of this Part (because the companies that were members of the group no longer together meet the condition in section 269ZZB(2)), and (b) immediately before the group ceased to be a group for the purposes of this Part— (i) two or more members of the group were companies within the charge to corporation tax, and (ii) no group allowance nomination under section 269ZS had effect in relation to the group. (2) All the companies that were, immediately before the group ceased to be a group for the purposes of this Part, members of the group and within the charge to corporation tax may together nominate (“the group allowance nomination”) one of their number (“the nominated company”) for the purposes of this Part. (3) It is irrelevant for the purposes of subsection (2) whether or not the companies (including the nominated company) are within the charge to corporation tax when the nomination is made. (4) A group allowance nomination under this section has effect during the period— (a) beginning with the date on which it is stated to take effect (see section 269ZS(5), as it has effect by virtue of subsection (5)(a) of this section), and (b) ending immediately before the group ceased to be a group for the purposes of this Part. (5) For the purposes of this Part, treat a group allowance nomination under this section as a group allowance nomination under section 269ZS, but that section is to apply to a group allowance nomination under this section subject to the following modifications— (a) section 269ZS(5) has effect as if, for the words in brackets, there were substituted “ (which must be earlier than the date on which the group ceased to be a group for the purposes of this Part) ”; (b) section 269ZS(6) has effect as if, for the words “is, when the nomination is made”, there were substituted “ was, immediately before the group ceased to be a group for the purposes of this Part ”; (c) section 269ZS(7) does not apply (but see subsection (4) of this section); (d) in section 269ZS(8), ignore references to the revocation of a group allowance nomination (however expressed). (6) Only one group allowance nomination under this section may be made in respect of a group.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds