Propose a change

Corporation Tax Act 2010

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

332DB Restriction where project in additionally-developed field qualified for field allowance

(1) This section applies to expenditure which— (a) is incurred by a company in relation to a project by reference to which an oil field was immediately before 1 April 2015 an additionally-developed oil field for the purposes of Chapter 7, (b) would in the absence of this section be relievable under section 332C, and (c) is not excluded from this section by subsection (5) (material completion) or subsection (6) (company without share of project-related reserves). In the following provisions of this section, expenditure to which this section applies is referred to as “relevant expenditure”. (2) Relevant expenditure incurred by a company in relation to a project on any day (“the relevant day”) is not relievable expenditure for the purposes of section 332C except— (a) if immediately before the relevant day the cumulative total of relevant expenditure attributable to the company's share of project-related reserves (see subsection (3)) exceeds the relevant project threshold (see subsection (4)), or (b) to the extent that, in a case not within paragraph (a), the amount of relevant expenditure incurred on the relevant day, when added to that cumulative total, exceeds the relevant project threshold. (3) The “cumulative total of relevant expenditure attributable to the company's share of project-related reserves” at any time is the total amount of relevant expenditure which is incurred by the company during the period beginning with 1 April 2015 and ending with that time, but this is subject to sections 332IA(5) and 332IB(6) (which relate to the disposal and acquisition of shares in project-related reserves). (4) The “relevant project threshold” is an amount given by the formula— 160 % × F × E where— F is the total field allowance for the oil field in relation to the project, as originally determined under section 356A for the purposes of Chapter 7; E is the company's share of project-related reserves at the end of the relevant day. (5) This section does not apply to expenditure which is incurred on or after the day determined by the OGA as that on which the project was materially completed. (6) This section does not apply to expenditure incurred by a company if— (a) the company does not, at the time when the expenditure is incurred, hold a share of project-related reserves, and (b) the expenditure is incurred in making an asset available in a way which gives rise to tariff receipts (as defined by section 15(3) of the Oil Taxation Act 1983) or tax-exempt tariffing receipts (as defined by section 6A(2) of that Act). (7) In this section “project-related reserves”, in relation to a project and an oil field, means the additional reserves of oil that the oil field has as a result of the project.

Your change, as a redline

332DB Restriction where project in additionally-developed field qualified for field allowance

(1) This section applies to expenditure which— (a) is incurred by a company in relation to a project by reference to which an oil field was immediately before 1 April 2015 an additionally-developed oil field for the purposes of Chapter 7, (b) would in the absence of this section be relievable under section 332C, and (c) is not excluded from this section by subsection (5) (material completion) or subsection (6) (company without share of project-related reserves). In the following provisions of this section, expenditure to which this section applies is referred to as “relevant expenditure”. (2) Relevant expenditure incurred by a company in relation to a project on any day (“the relevant day”) is not relievable expenditure for the purposes of section 332C except— (a) if immediately before the relevant day the cumulative total of relevant expenditure attributable to the company's share of project-related reserves (see subsection (3)) exceeds the relevant project threshold (see subsection (4)), or (b) to the extent that, in a case not within paragraph (a), the amount of relevant expenditure incurred on the relevant day, when added to that cumulative total, exceeds the relevant project threshold. (3) The “cumulative total of relevant expenditure attributable to the company's share of project-related reserves” at any time is the total amount of relevant expenditure which is incurred by the company during the period beginning with 1 April 2015 and ending with that time, but this is subject to sections 332IA(5) and 332IB(6) (which relate to the disposal and acquisition of shares in project-related reserves). (4) The “relevant project threshold” is an amount given by the formula— 160 % × F × E where— F is the total field allowance for the oil field in relation to the project, as originally determined under section 356A for the purposes of Chapter 7; E is the company's share of project-related reserves at the end of the relevant day. (5) This section does not apply to expenditure which is incurred on or after the day determined by the OGA as that on which the project was materially completed. (6) This section does not apply to expenditure incurred by a company if— (a) the company does not, at the time when the expenditure is incurred, hold a share of project-related reserves, and (b) the expenditure is incurred in making an asset available in a way which gives rise to tariff receipts (as defined by section 15(3) of the Oil Taxation Act 1983) or tax-exempt tariffing receipts (as defined by section 6A(2) of that Act). (7) In this section “project-related reserves”, in relation to a project and an oil field, means the additional reserves of oil that the oil field has as a result of the project.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds