Propose a change

Corporation Tax Act 2010

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

356JFA Expenditure on acquisition of asset: disqualifying conditions

(1) Investment expenditure incurred by a company (“the acquiring company”) on the acquisition of an asset is not relievable expenditure for the purposes of section 356JF if either of the disqualifying conditions in this section applies to the asset. (2) The first disqualifying condition is that investment expenditure incurred before the acquisition, by the acquiring company or another company, in acquiring, leasing, bringing into existence or enhancing the value of the asset was relievable under section 356JF. (3) The second disqualifying condition is that— (a) the asset— (i) is the whole or part of the equity in a licensed area or sub-area, or (ii) is acquired in connection with a transfer to the acquiring company of the whole or part of the equity in a licensed area or sub-area, (b) expenditure was incurred, at any time before the acquisition, by the acquiring company or another company, in acquiring, leasing, bringing into existence or enhancing the value of the asset, and (c) any of that expenditure— (i) related to the cluster area, and (ii) would have been relievable under section 356JF if this Chapter had applied to expenditure incurred at that time. (4) For the purposes of subsection (3)(a)(ii), it does not matter whether the asset is acquired at the time of the transfer. (5) In this section any reference to expenditure which was incurred by a company in “leasing” an asset is to expenditure incurred by the company under an agreement under which the asset was leased to the company.

Your change, as a redline

356JFA Expenditure on acquisition of asset: disqualifying conditions

(1) Investment expenditure incurred by a company (“the acquiring company”) on the acquisition of an asset is not relievable expenditure for the purposes of section 356JF if either of the disqualifying conditions in this section applies to the asset. (2) The first disqualifying condition is that investment expenditure incurred before the acquisition, by the acquiring company or another company, in acquiring, leasing, bringing into existence or enhancing the value of the asset was relievable under section 356JF. (3) The second disqualifying condition is that— (a) the asset— (i) is the whole or part of the equity in a licensed area or sub-area, or (ii) is acquired in connection with a transfer to the acquiring company of the whole or part of the equity in a licensed area or sub-area, (b) expenditure was incurred, at any time before the acquisition, by the acquiring company or another company, in acquiring, leasing, bringing into existence or enhancing the value of the asset, and (c) any of that expenditure— (i) related to the cluster area, and (ii) would have been relievable under section 356JF if this Chapter had applied to expenditure incurred at that time. (4) For the purposes of subsection (3)(a)(ii), it does not matter whether the asset is acquired at the time of the transfer. (5) In this section any reference to expenditure which was incurred by a company in “leasing” an asset is to expenditure incurred by the company under an agreement under which the asset was leased to the company.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds