Propose a change

Corporation Tax Act 2010

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

357BHC Mixed sources of income

(1) This section applies to any income that— (a) is mixed income, or (b) is paid under a mixed agreement. (2) “Mixed income” means the proceeds of sale where an item falling within subsection (2) of section 357BH and an item not falling within that subsection are sold together as, or as part of, a single unit for a single price. (3) A “mixed agreement” is an agreement providing for— (a) one or more of the matters in paragraphs (a) to (c) of subsection (4), and (b) one or more of the matters in paragraphs (d) to (g) of that subsection. (4) The matters are— (a) the sale of an item falling within section 357BH(2), (b) the grant of any right falling within paragraph (a), (b) or (c) of section 357BH(6), (c) a sale or disposal falling within section 357BH(7), (d) the sale of any other item, (e) the grant of any other right, (f) any other sale or disposal, (g) the provision of any services. (5) So much of the income as on a just and reasonable apportionment is properly attributable to— (a) the sale of an item falling within section 357BH(2), (b) the grant of any right falling within paragraph (a), (b) or (c) of section 357BH(6), or (c) a sale or disposal falling within section 357BH(7), is to be regarded for the purposes of this Part as relevant IP income. (6) But where the amount of income that on such an apportionment is properly attributable to any of the matters in paragraphs (d) to (g) of subsection (4) is a trivial proportion of the income to which this section applies, all of that income is to be regarded for the purposes of this Part as relevant IP income.

Your change, as a redline

357BHC Mixed sources of income

(1) This section applies to any income that— (a) is mixed income, or (b) is paid under a mixed agreement. (2) “Mixed income” means the proceeds of sale where an item falling within subsection (2) of section 357BH and an item not falling within that subsection are sold together as, or as part of, a single unit for a single price. (3) A “mixed agreement” is an agreement providing for— (a) one or more of the matters in paragraphs (a) to (c) of subsection (4), and (b) one or more of the matters in paragraphs (d) to (g) of that subsection. (4) The matters are— (a) the sale of an item falling within section 357BH(2), (b) the grant of any right falling within paragraph (a), (b) or (c) of section 357BH(6), (c) a sale or disposal falling within section 357BH(7), (d) the sale of any other item, (e) the grant of any other right, (f) any other sale or disposal, (g) the provision of any services. (5) So much of the income as on a just and reasonable apportionment is properly attributable to— (a) the sale of an item falling within section 357BH(2), (b) the grant of any right falling within paragraph (a), (b) or (c) of section 357BH(6), or (c) a sale or disposal falling within section 357BH(7), is to be regarded for the purposes of this Part as relevant IP income. (6) But where the amount of income that on such an apportionment is properly attributable to any of the matters in paragraphs (d) to (g) of subsection (4) is a trivial proportion of the income to which this section applies, all of that income is to be regarded for the purposes of this Part as relevant IP income.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds