Propose a change

Corporation Tax Act 2010

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

357CHA Shortfall in qualifying expenditure

(1) There is a shortfall in qualifying expenditure in relation to the separate programme trade of a television production company or (as the case may be) the separate video game trade of a video games development company for a relevant accounting period if the actual qualifying expenditure of the trade for the accounting period (as adjusted under subsections (8) to (11)) is less than 75% of the average amount of qualifying expenditure. (2) The amount that is to be added to the actual qualifying expenditure for the purposes of section 357CG(5A) is an amount equal to the difference between— (a) 75% of the average amount of qualifying expenditure, and (b) the actual qualifying expenditure, as adjusted under subsections (8) to (11). (3) In this section— (a) the “actual qualifying expenditure” of a trade of a company for an accounting period is the amount of qualifying expenditure that (ignoring section 357CG(5A)) is brought into account in calculating the profits of the trade for the accounting period, and (b) the following terms have the meaning given by section 357CG(6)— “qualifying expenditure”, “relevant accounting period”, “the separate programme trade”, “the separate video game trade”, “television production company”, “video games development company”. (4) The average amount of qualifying expenditure is— E N × 365 where— E is the amount of qualifying expenditure that— has been incurred by the company during the relevant period, and has been brought into account in calculating the profits of the trade for any accounting period ending before the first relevant accounting period, and N is the number of days in the relevant period. (5) The relevant period is the shorter of— (a) the period of 4 years ending immediately before the first relevant accounting period, and (b) the period beginning with the day on which the company begins to carry on the trade and ending immediately before the first relevant accounting period. (6) For a relevant accounting period of less than 12 months, the average amount of qualifying expenditure is proportionately reduced. (7) Subsections (8) to (11) apply for the purposes of determining— (a) whether there is a shortfall in qualifying expenditure for a relevant accounting period, and (b) if there is such a shortfall, the amount to be added by virtue of subsection (2). (8) If the amount of the actual qualifying expenditure for a relevant accounting period is greater than the average amount of qualifying expenditure, the difference between the two amounts is to be added to the actual qualifying expenditure for the next relevant accounting period. (9) If— (a) there is not a shortfall in qualifying expenditure for a relevant accounting period, but (b) in the absence of any additional amount, there would be a shortfall in qualifying expenditure for that accounting period, the remaining portion of the additional amount is to be added to the actual qualifying expenditure for the next relevant accounting period. (10) For the purposes of this section— “additional amount”, in relation to a relevant accounting period, means any amount added to the actual qualifying expenditure for that accounting period by virtue of subsection (8), (9) or (11), and “the remaining portion” of an additional amount is so much of that amount as exceeds the difference between— the actual qualifying expenditure for the relevant accounting period in the absence of the additional amount, and 75% of the average amount of qualifying expenditure. (11) If— (a) there is not a shortfall in qualifying expenditure for a relevant accounting period, and (b) there would not be a shortfall in qualifying expenditure for that accounting period in the absence of any additional amount, the additional amount is to be added to the actual qualifying expenditure for the next relevant accounting period (in addition to any additional amount so added by virtue of subsection (8)).

Your change, as a redline

357CHA Shortfall in qualifying expenditure

(1) There is a shortfall in qualifying expenditure in relation to the separate programme trade of a television production company or (as the case may be) the separate video game trade of a video games development company for a relevant accounting period if the actual qualifying expenditure of the trade for the accounting period (as adjusted under subsections (8) to (11)) is less than 75% of the average amount of qualifying expenditure. (2) The amount that is to be added to the actual qualifying expenditure for the purposes of section 357CG(5A) is an amount equal to the difference between— (a) 75% of the average amount of qualifying expenditure, and (b) the actual qualifying expenditure, as adjusted under subsections (8) to (11). (3) In this section— (a) the “actual qualifying expenditure” of a trade of a company for an accounting period is the amount of qualifying expenditure that (ignoring section 357CG(5A)) is brought into account in calculating the profits of the trade for the accounting period, and (b) the following terms have the meaning given by section 357CG(6)— “qualifying expenditure”, “relevant accounting period”, “the separate programme trade”, “the separate video game trade”, “television production company”, “video games development company”. (4) The average amount of qualifying expenditure is— E N × 365 where— E is the amount of qualifying expenditure that— has been incurred by the company during the relevant period, and has been brought into account in calculating the profits of the trade for any accounting period ending before the first relevant accounting period, and N is the number of days in the relevant period. (5) The relevant period is the shorter of— (a) the period of 4 years ending immediately before the first relevant accounting period, and (b) the period beginning with the day on which the company begins to carry on the trade and ending immediately before the first relevant accounting period. (6) For a relevant accounting period of less than 12 months, the average amount of qualifying expenditure is proportionately reduced. (7) Subsections (8) to (11) apply for the purposes of determining— (a) whether there is a shortfall in qualifying expenditure for a relevant accounting period, and (b) if there is such a shortfall, the amount to be added by virtue of subsection (2). (8) If the amount of the actual qualifying expenditure for a relevant accounting period is greater than the average amount of qualifying expenditure, the difference between the two amounts is to be added to the actual qualifying expenditure for the next relevant accounting period. (9) If— (a) there is not a shortfall in qualifying expenditure for a relevant accounting period, but (b) in the absence of any additional amount, there would be a shortfall in qualifying expenditure for that accounting period, the remaining portion of the additional amount is to be added to the actual qualifying expenditure for the next relevant accounting period. (10) For the purposes of this section— “additional amount”, in relation to a relevant accounting period, means any amount added to the actual qualifying expenditure for that accounting period by virtue of subsection (8), (9) or (11), and “the remaining portion” of an additional amount is so much of that amount as exceeds the difference between— the actual qualifying expenditure for the relevant accounting period in the absence of the additional amount, and 75% of the average amount of qualifying expenditure. (11) If— (a) there is not a shortfall in qualifying expenditure for a relevant accounting period, and (b) there would not be a shortfall in qualifying expenditure for that accounting period in the absence of any additional amount, the additional amount is to be added to the actual qualifying expenditure for the next relevant accounting period (in addition to any additional amount so added by virtue of subsection (8)).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds