Propose a change

Corporation Tax Act 2010

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

43 Claim period in case of ring fence or mineral extraction trades

(1) This section applies in relation to a claim under section 37 if— (a) as a result of section 165 of CAA 2001 (general decommissioning expenditure after ceasing ring fence trade) a company's qualifying expenditure for the accounting period in which it ceases to carry on a ring fence trade (as defined in section 162 of that Act) is increased by any amount, or (b) as a result of section 416 or 416ZA of CAA 2001 (expenditure on site restoration ) any expenditure is treated as qualifying expenditure of a company incurred on the last day of trading. (2) So far as the claim relates to the increase mentioned in subsection (1)(a), the period of two years specified in section 37(7)(a) for making the claim is instead to be read as a reference to the period given by adding two years to the post-cessation period (within the meaning of section 165 of CAA 2001). (3) So far as the claim relates to the expenditure mentioned in subsection (1)(b), the period of two years specified in section 37(7)(a) for making the claim is instead to be read as a reference to a period of 5 years.

Your change, as a redline

43 Claim period in case of ring fence or mineral extraction trades

(1) This section applies in relation to a claim under section 37 if— (a) as a result of section 165 of CAA 2001 (general decommissioning expenditure after ceasing ring fence trade) a company's qualifying expenditure for the accounting period in which it ceases to carry on a ring fence trade (as defined in section 162 of that Act) is increased by any amount, or (b) as a result of section 416 or 416ZA of CAA 2001 (expenditure on site restoration ) any expenditure is treated as qualifying expenditure of a company incurred on the last day of trading. (2) So far as the claim relates to the increase mentioned in subsection (1)(a), the period of two years specified in section 37(7)(a) for making the claim is instead to be read as a reference to the period given by adding two years to the post-cessation period (within the meaning of section 165 of CAA 2001). (3) So far as the claim relates to the expenditure mentioned in subsection (1)(b), the period of two years specified in section 37(7)(a) for making the claim is instead to be read as a reference to a period of 5 years.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds