Propose a change

Corporation Tax Act 2010

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

768 Certain tax consequences not to have effect

(1) This section applies if— (a) there is a type 3 finance arrangement, and (b) any relevant change in relation to the partnership would have the relevant effect (ignoring this section). (2) The relevant effect is that— (a) an amount of income on which a relevant member would otherwise have been charged to corporation tax is not so charged, (b) an amount which would otherwise have been brought into account in calculating for corporation tax purposes any income of a relevant member is not so brought into account, or (c) a relevant member becomes entitled to an income deduction. (3) A relevant member is a person who— (a) was a member of the partnership immediately before the relevant change in relation to it occurred, and (b) is not the lender. (4) If this section applies— (a) sections 1259 to 1265 of CTA 2009 (partnerships involving companies) are to have effect in relation to any relevant member as if the relevant change in relation to the partnership had not occurred, and (b) accordingly the finance arrangement is not to have the relevant effect. (5) In deciding whether subsection (1)(b) is met assume that amounts of income equal to the payments mentioned in section 767(2)(d) were payable to the partnership before the relevant change in relation to it occurred. (6) An income deduction is— (a) a deduction in calculating income for corporation tax purposes, or (b) a deduction from total profits.

Your change, as a redline

768 Certain tax consequences not to have effect

(1) This section applies if— (a) there is a type 3 finance arrangement, and (b) any relevant change in relation to the partnership would have the relevant effect (ignoring this section). (2) The relevant effect is that— (a) an amount of income on which a relevant member would otherwise have been charged to corporation tax is not so charged, (b) an amount which would otherwise have been brought into account in calculating for corporation tax purposes any income of a relevant member is not so brought into account, or (c) a relevant member becomes entitled to an income deduction. (3) A relevant member is a person who— (a) was a member of the partnership immediately before the relevant change in relation to it occurred, and (b) is not the lender. (4) If this section applies— (a) sections 1259 to 1265 of CTA 2009 (partnerships involving companies) are to have effect in relation to any relevant member as if the relevant change in relation to the partnership had not occurred, and (b) accordingly the finance arrangement is not to have the relevant effect. (5) In deciding whether subsection (1)(b) is met assume that amounts of income equal to the payments mentioned in section 767(2)(d) were payable to the partnership before the relevant change in relation to it occurred. (6) An income deduction is— (a) a deduction in calculating income for corporation tax purposes, or (b) a deduction from total profits.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds