Propose a change

Corporation Tax Act 2010

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

81 The control and independence requirement

(1) The control element of the requirement is that— (a) the company must not control (whether on its own or together with any person connected with it) any company which is not a qualifying subsidiary of the company, and (b) no arrangements must be in existence by virtue of which the company could fail to meet paragraph (a) (whether at a time during the continuous period that is relevant for the purposes of section 78(3) or otherwise). (2) The independence element of the requirement is that— (a) the company must not— (i) be a 51% subsidiary of another company, or (ii) be under the control of another company (or of another company and any other person connected with that other company), without being a 51% subsidiary of that other company, and (b) no arrangements must be in existence by virtue of which the company could fail to meet paragraph (a) (whether at a time during the continuous period that is relevant for the purposes of section 78(3) or otherwise). (3) This section is subject to section 87(3). (4) In this section— “arrangements” includes any scheme, agreement or understanding (whether or not legally enforceable), “control”, in subsection (1)(a), is to be read in accordance with sections 450 and 451 (but see section 1124 for the meaning of “control” in subsection (2)(a)(ii)), and “qualifying subsidiary” is to be read in accordance with section 191 of ITA 2007.

Your change, as a redline

81 The control and independence requirement

(1) The control element of the requirement is that— (a) the company must not control (whether on its own or together with any person connected with it) any company which is not a qualifying subsidiary of the company, and (b) no arrangements must be in existence by virtue of which the company could fail to meet paragraph (a) (whether at a time during the continuous period that is relevant for the purposes of section 78(3) or otherwise). (2) The independence element of the requirement is that— (a) the company must not— (i) be a 51% subsidiary of another company, or (ii) be under the control of another company (or of another company and any other person connected with that other company), without being a 51% subsidiary of that other company, and (b) no arrangements must be in existence by virtue of which the company could fail to meet paragraph (a) (whether at a time during the continuous period that is relevant for the purposes of section 78(3) or otherwise). (3) This section is subject to section 87(3). (4) In this section— “arrangements” includes any scheme, agreement or understanding (whether or not legally enforceable), “control”, in subsection (1)(a), is to be read in accordance with sections 450 and 451 (but see section 1124 for the meaning of “control” in subsection (2)(a)(ii)), and “qualifying subsidiary” is to be read in accordance with section 191 of ITA 2007.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds