Propose a change

Corporation Tax Act 2010

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

937F Ring-fenced scheme losses and relevant scheme profits

(1) Subsection (2) applies if— (a) a company makes one or more scheme losses in an accounting period in relation to a risk transfer scheme, and (b) disregarding any profits or losses made otherwise than as a result of the scheme, the relevant group makes a pre-tax economic loss in the period as a result of fluctuations in the scheme rate, index or value. (2) The relevant proportion of each scheme loss made by the company in the accounting period is a “ring-fenced scheme loss”. (3) For this purpose “ the relevant proportion ” means— A–B–CA where— A is the total of the scheme losses made in the period in relation to the scheme by the members of the relevant group, B is the total of the scheme profits made in the period in relation to the scheme by the members of the relevant group, and C is the pre-tax economic loss referred to in subsection (1)(b). (4) Subsection (5) applies if— (a) a company makes one or more scheme profits in an accounting period in relation to a risk transfer scheme, and (b) disregarding any profits or losses made otherwise than as a result of the scheme, the relevant group makes a pre-tax economic profit in the period as a result of fluctuations in the scheme rate, index or value. (5) The relevant proportion of each scheme profit made by the company in the accounting period is a “relevant scheme profit”. (6) For this purpose “ the relevant proportion ” means— A–B–CA where— A is the total of the scheme profits made in the period in relation to the scheme by the members of the relevant group, B is the total of the scheme losses made in the period in relation to the scheme by the members of the relevant group, and C is the pre-tax economic profit referred to in subsection (4)(b).

Your change, as a redline

937F Ring-fenced scheme losses and relevant scheme profits

(1) Subsection (2) applies if— (a) a company makes one or more scheme losses in an accounting period in relation to a risk transfer scheme, and (b) disregarding any profits or losses made otherwise than as a result of the scheme, the relevant group makes a pre-tax economic loss in the period as a result of fluctuations in the scheme rate, index or value. (2) The relevant proportion of each scheme loss made by the company in the accounting period is a “ring-fenced scheme loss”. (3) For this purpose “ the relevant proportion ” means— A–B–CA where— A is the total of the scheme losses made in the period in relation to the scheme by the members of the relevant group, B is the total of the scheme profits made in the period in relation to the scheme by the members of the relevant group, and C is the pre-tax economic loss referred to in subsection (1)(b). (4) Subsection (5) applies if— (a) a company makes one or more scheme profits in an accounting period in relation to a risk transfer scheme, and (b) disregarding any profits or losses made otherwise than as a result of the scheme, the relevant group makes a pre-tax economic profit in the period as a result of fluctuations in the scheme rate, index or value. (5) The relevant proportion of each scheme profit made by the company in the accounting period is a “relevant scheme profit”. (6) For this purpose “ the relevant proportion ” means— A–B–CA where— A is the total of the scheme profits made in the period in relation to the scheme by the members of the relevant group, B is the total of the scheme losses made in the period in relation to the scheme by the members of the relevant group, and C is the pre-tax economic profit referred to in subsection (4)(b).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds