The Family Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2026
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
5 Insertion of new rule 25.5A
After rule 25.5 (further provisions about the court’s power to restrict expert evidence) insert— Requirement for experts to be regulated in children proceedings 25.5A. (1) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), the court may only give permission under section 13(1), (3) or (5) of the 2014 Act if the expert evidence is from a regulated expert. (2) The requirement set out in paragraph (1) does not apply to expert evidence from an international social worker, a technical expert or an expert instructed in proceedings under Schedule 1 to the 1989 Act. (3) The court may give permission under section 13(1), (3) or (5) of the 2014 Act to instruct any expert where there is no regulated expert available. (4) For the purposes of paragraph (3), no regulated expert is available where— (a) the issue to which the expert evidence relates may only be resolved with the expertise of an expert who is not a regulated expert; or (b) the instruction of a regulated expert would cause significant delay in the proceedings which would not be in the best interests of the child. (5) If permission is given under paragraph (3), the court must give reasons for its decision, including— (a) the steps taken by the parties to identify a regulated expert, and (b) the reasons why the expert instructed meets the standards set out in the annex to Practice Direction 25B. .
5 Insertion of new rule 25.5A
After rule 25.5 (further provisions about the court’s power to restrict expert evidence) insert— Requirement for experts to be regulated in children proceedings 25.5A. (1) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), the court may only give permission under section 13(1), (3) or (5) of the 2014 Act if the expert evidence is from a regulated expert. (2) The requirement set out in paragraph (1) does not apply to expert evidence from an international social worker, a technical expert or an expert instructed in proceedings under Schedule 1 to the 1989 Act. (3) The court may give permission under section 13(1), (3) or (5) of the 2014 Act to instruct any expert where there is no regulated expert available. (4) For the purposes of paragraph (3), no regulated expert is available where— (a) the issue to which the expert evidence relates may only be resolved with the expertise of an expert who is not a regulated expert; or (b) the instruction of a regulated expert would cause significant delay in the proceedings which would not be in the best interests of the child. (5) If permission is given under paragraph (3), the court must give reasons for its decision, including— (a) the steps taken by the parties to identify a regulated expert, and (b) the reasons why the expert instructed meets the standards set out in the annex to Practice Direction 25B. .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.