Nuclear Safeguards Act 2000
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
11 Minor and consequential amendments.
(1) In section 6(3) of the Atomic Energy Authority Act 1954 (persons exempted from prohibition on entry to certain premises) in paragraph (bb), at the end there is inserted “ or under Article 11 of the Additional Protocol (within the meaning of the Nuclear Safeguards Act 2000) ”. (2) In paragraph 3(2) of Schedule 1 to the Nuclear Installations Act 1965 (persons exempted from prohibition on entry to certain sites) in paragraph (bb), at the end there is inserted “ or under Article 11 of the Additional Protocol (within the meaning of the Nuclear Safeguards Act 2000) ”. (3) In section 2 of the Nuclear Safeguards and Electricity (Finance) Act 1978 (rights of Agency inspectors)— (a) in subsection (1), after “article 85” there is inserted “ of the Safeguards Agreement or Article 11 of the Additional Protocol (within the meaning of the Nuclear Safeguards Act 2000) ”; (b) in subsection (4), for the words from “shall be liable” to the end there is substituted shall be guilty of an offence. (4A) A person guilty of an offence under subsection (4) above shall be liable— (a) on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum; and (b) on conviction on indictment, to a fine. ; and (c) after subsection (7), there is inserted— (8) If in any proceedings any question arises whether a person at any time when purporting to exercise powers under this section was or was not a person designated as mentioned in subsection (1) above, a certificate issued by or under the authority of the Secretary of State stating any fact relevant to that question shall be conclusive evidence of that fact.
11 Minor and consequential amendments.
(1) In section 6(3) of the Atomic Energy Authority Act 1954 (persons exempted from prohibition on entry to certain premises) in paragraph (bb), at the end there is inserted “ or under Article 11 of the Additional Protocol (within the meaning of the Nuclear Safeguards Act 2000) ”. (2) In paragraph 3(2) of Schedule 1 to the Nuclear Installations Act 1965 (persons exempted from prohibition on entry to certain sites) in paragraph (bb), at the end there is inserted “ or under Article 11 of the Additional Protocol (within the meaning of the Nuclear Safeguards Act 2000) ”. (3) In section 2 of the Nuclear Safeguards and Electricity (Finance) Act 1978 (rights of Agency inspectors)— (a) in subsection (1), after “article 85” there is inserted “ of the Safeguards Agreement or Article 11 of the Additional Protocol (within the meaning of the Nuclear Safeguards Act 2000) ”; (b) in subsection (4), for the words from “shall be liable” to the end there is substituted shall be guilty of an offence. (4A) A person guilty of an offence under subsection (4) above shall be liable— (a) on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum; and (b) on conviction on indictment, to a fine. ; and (c) after subsection (7), there is inserted— (8) If in any proceedings any question arises whether a person at any time when purporting to exercise powers under this section was or was not a person designated as mentioned in subsection (1) above, a certificate issued by or under the authority of the Secretary of State stating any fact relevant to that question shall be conclusive evidence of that fact.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.