Horserace Betting and Olympic Lottery Act 2004
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
SCHEDULE 6 Repeals
Section 38 Short title and chapter | Extent of repeal Betting, Gaming and Lotteries Act 1963 (c. 2) | In section 1(5)(a), “but no other races”. In section 3(1)— “or to the Totalisator Board”, “or, as the case may be, by the said Board”, and “or by the said Board”. In section 3(2)— “or to the said Board”, and “or, as the case may be, the Board”. In section 3(3)— “The said Board”, and “by that Board or, as the case may be,”. In section 5(3)— “by the Totalisator Board or, with the authority of that Board, by the persons having the management of that racecourse”, and “by that Board or, as the case may be, by those persons”. In section 6(1) “only”. In section 9— in subsection (1) the words from “Provided that” to the end, subsection (2)(b), in subsection (2)(c)(i) “or by the Totalisator Board”, and in subsection (2)(c)(i) “or, as the case may be, with or through that Board”. Section 12. Section 14. Section 15. Section 24(2)(e). In section 31(1)— “and the Totalisator Board”, “of each of the Boards”, and “in question”. In section 55(1)— in the definition of “bookmaker”, “other than the Totalisator Board”, and the definitions of “recognised horse race”, “sponsored pool betting” and “the Totalisator Board”. In paragraph 19(a)(i) of Schedule 1, “in the case of an applicant other than the Totalisator Board,”. Horserace Totalisator and Betting Levy Boards Act 1972 (c. 69) | The whole Act. Race Relations Act 1976 (c. 74) | In Part II of Schedule 1A, “The Horserace Totalisator Board”. National Lottery etc. Act 1993 (c. 39) | Section 17. Section 21(2). Section 22(3)(e). Section 30. Horserace Totalisator Board Act 1997 (c. 1) | The whole Act. Trustee Act 2000 (c. 29) | Paragraph 34 of Schedule 2. Freedom of Information Act 2000 (c. 36) | In Part VI of Schedule 1, “The Horserace Totalisator Board”.
SCHEDULE 6 Repeals
Section 38 Short title and chapter | Extent of repeal Betting, Gaming and Lotteries Act 1963 (c. 2) | In section 1(5)(a), “but no other races”. In section 3(1)— “or to the Totalisator Board”, “or, as the case may be, by the said Board”, and “or by the said Board”. In section 3(2)— “or to the said Board”, and “or, as the case may be, the Board”. In section 3(3)— “The said Board”, and “by that Board or, as the case may be,”. In section 5(3)— “by the Totalisator Board or, with the authority of that Board, by the persons having the management of that racecourse”, and “by that Board or, as the case may be, by those persons”. In section 6(1) “only”. In section 9— in subsection (1) the words from “Provided that” to the end, subsection (2)(b), in subsection (2)(c)(i) “or by the Totalisator Board”, and in subsection (2)(c)(i) “or, as the case may be, with or through that Board”. Section 12. Section 14. Section 15. Section 24(2)(e). In section 31(1)— “and the Totalisator Board”, “of each of the Boards”, and “in question”. In section 55(1)— in the definition of “bookmaker”, “other than the Totalisator Board”, and the definitions of “recognised horse race”, “sponsored pool betting” and “the Totalisator Board”. In paragraph 19(a)(i) of Schedule 1, “in the case of an applicant other than the Totalisator Board,”. Horserace Totalisator and Betting Levy Boards Act 1972 (c. 69) | The whole Act. Race Relations Act 1976 (c. 74) | In Part II of Schedule 1A, “The Horserace Totalisator Board”. National Lottery etc. Act 1993 (c. 39) | Section 17. Section 21(2). Section 22(3)(e). Section 30. Horserace Totalisator Board Act 1997 (c. 1) | The whole Act. Trustee Act 2000 (c. 29) | Paragraph 34 of Schedule 2. Freedom of Information Act 2000 (c. 36) | In Part VI of Schedule 1, “The Horserace Totalisator Board”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.